this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
185 points (95.6% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2693 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

German teenagers and young adults find themselves increasingly unsatisfied and likely to vote for the far right, according to a survey. Fears about prosperity are highlighted as a possible cause.

Young people are more likely to vote for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) than previously, a study on Tuesday showed.

Authors of the "Youth in Germany 2024" study said that under-30s were increasingly disgruntled with their social and economic situation, and that fears about future prosperity were driving a shift to the right.

The AfD's signature issue is a hard-line anti-immigration stance, and the data showed that migration was among young people's main concerns.

The online study, conducted in January and February, found that young people were becoming increasingly dissatisfied, especially with their social and economic situation, compared with previous years.

After the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors said economic and political worries for example due to inflation, high rents, the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East or the division of society had taken center stage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Look mate, if you just said "I'm a democrat so I'm a liberal" I would've understood that. I'm not that nitpicky about it. But a self identifying "RADICAL LEFTIST" would absolutely never identify himself with the term "liberal". Hell, radical leftists (and including the far left) use that term as an insult. Which of course raises some questions when you use it for yourself while also being "far left". It makes it seem like you're roleplaying the "radical leftist" role. Just my two cents, you do you.

Also, no, "liberal" hasn't changed definitions, ever. It was always the same thing: an adherent to liberalism. If you're far left you're a commie or an anarchist or whatever. Communism/Anarchism has nothing to do with Liberalism. They're on different parts of the political spectrum. If you're from the US I'll make this easy for you: both democrats and republicans count as liberals. They're both adherent parties to liberalism.

That's like claiming you're a far right socialist lol

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I've likely been around long before you, I've survived transform, I've been through war, I've survived anti Communist death squads, I've seen the jungles full of civilians fleeing capitalist bombs. don't think you can educate me on the world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Then go take a political science class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

There is absolutely nothing to discuss here. This is not "the world". This is political science. And it isn't up for any weird debate. It's a term written in countless research papers and field texts, and is not up for change due to whatever definition you guys happen to read in the news today.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

From your link: "In Europe and North America, the establishment of social liberalism (often called simply liberalism in the United States) became a key component in expanding the welfare state."

Idk, that seems compatible with most of the left-of-center spectrum, and certainly not something you would find a libertarian or conservative supporting. I can see how it's not compatible with auth-left positions, though.

Perhaps you're referring to neoliberalism, which, in my understanding, dropped all the social welfare stuff in favor of corporate welfare. In that case, I can understand how that term could be used as an insult.

In my eyes liberalism != neoliberalism. I consider myself liberal, and I despise neoliberal policies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)