this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
508 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19817 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A great point in favour of maps is that each iteration is independent, so could theoretically be executed in parallel. This heavily depends on the language implementation, though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Technically this is also possible with for loops, like with OpenMP

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Imperative for loops have no guarantee at all that iterations could be executed in parallel.

You can do some (usually expensive, and never complete) analysis to find some cases, but smart compilers tend to work the best the dumbest you need them to be. Having a loop that you can just blindly parallelize will some times lead to it being parallel in practice, while having a loop where a PhD knows how to decide if you can parallelize will lead to sequential programs in practice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

While you do have a fair point, I was referring to the case where one is basically implementing a map operation as a for loop.