this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
1330 points (95.7% liked)

People Twitter

5267 readers
1538 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jax 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just going to go ahead and assume that both of you are taking into account that not everywhere has the same roads - IMO (and I think it's just proven logically) the middle of the road should be where the fastest cars are.

On a 4 lane road (with a divider like 2/2) those middle two lanes should have the fast drivers. This way the people who want to go fast do so, and they don't have to deal with people merging onto the road. Neither do the people merging have to deal with the fast drivers.

[–] zalgotext 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Having the middle lane/lanes be the "passing"/speeding lanes is less safe though, because both outside lanes then have to worry about faster traffic merging into them to pass people in the middle lanes, rather than just a single lane. Also the people merging absolutely would still have to deal with fast drivers, when drivers in the faster middle lanes try to pass each other on the right. Doing so would put them in the same lane people are using to merge onto the highway.

Edit: also people in the slower left lane would have to merge into and out of the faster middle passing lanes in order to exit the highway, which just sounds like a recipe for disaster.

Edit edit: are you talking about 4 bidirectional lanes, with, for example, two going north and two going south? If so my bad for the misunderstanding, we actually agree

[–] Jax 4 points 7 months ago

Two going north, two going south.