this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

1928 readers
7 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When you’re on the hunt for a new USB power adaptor, you may come across a few options with gallium nitride (GaN) technology. These charging bricks tend to be a bit expensive. But due to their reduced size and increased charging ability, a GaN charger may be your ideal purchase. It could even help you save money in the long run.

Most USB chargers use silicon semiconductors. Gallium nitride (GaN) is simply a power-efficient alternative to silicon. It allows a charger to achieve small size without a reduction in charging speed or thermal performance. A GaN charger is ideal for travelling or powering several high-wattage devices, such as laptops.

With more and more laptops charging through USB-C, and more phones making use of ultra-fast charging, you'll start to notice that the silicon based chargers can get really hot during charging these devices.

Instead of buying a large silicon-based charger that only has two ports (with a shared throughput), you can buy a GaN charger with four, five, or even six high-speed charging ports.

#technology #chargers #GaN

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why Apple’s push towards ARM is a great step forward

[–] Orygin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They ship their MBP 16" with 140w power supplies, way higher than framework standard 60w charger. But I would guess it's to be able to push full power and still charge the battery as fast as possible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, its pretty awesome to be able to charge stuff so fast, not to mention the M1 power consumption is tiny in the first place

[–] Orygin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest difference for me was the noise. Intel mbp fans spinning as soon as you open more than one application, going turbo if you compile anything and slowing down in the summer because of the heat.

The only time I heard my M1 Mac fans is when I left the poor thing in direct sunlight outside

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah kinda makes you wonder why even bother with the pros, just get the airs

[–] Orygin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would Guess the air cannot sustain the performance as well as the pro. The battery is way bigger afaik Doing 16+h on a single battery charge is insane

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny thing is that all the video reviewers review what they know, specifically "editing and rendering video content for their channel".

The majority of users won't even come close to the power usage that those guys require, demand and talk about.

Personally I do a lot of dev work but have never really run into thermal or performance problems on my MBP, and I suspect I'll be fine on MBA as well.

[–] Orygin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, my job was for a video platform provider, so transcoding, rendering and compiling at the same time is a major use case. I think there exists a target audience for the MBP.

You're right however that most lightweight pro users could do with an air, like graphics designers (2d) or even front end devs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even backend devs! Docker is lightweight, Go (what I use) is also super light. Maybe if a dev ran VMs and worked with JVM monstrosities, but those guys would be using a Windows intel beast machine anyway.

[–] Orygin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm a Go dev too and running some services locally is no issue, but our local Dev env used to run in a VM with a lot of stuff on it. The M1 chugs along without an issue but the Intel macs just throttle immediately.

I do believe for this the pro is way better than the air

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just seems so wasteful to run on the metal ya know?