this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
-33 points (13.3% liked)

Conservative

386 readers
34 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
-33
Does The New York Times Actually Care About Mass Shootings? (anncoulter.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s all about controlling people. They focus on my guns which are kept responsibly and legally

Their plans violate th constitution. I know you guys think it’s toilet paper but to us it’s how we run the country.

If liberals were serious they’d support more law enforcement, longer sentences and other things proven to work. Joe proved that with his crime bill.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I hope anyone reading this understands that having a different interpretation of the constitution and having different ideas about how to reduce senseless deaths -even if possibly mistaken or misguided- this doesn't mean it's about controlling people and doesn't mean they think the constitution is toilet paper. That's just extremist language intended to deligitimize someones difference of opinion.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When the liberals want to ban weapons protected by the 2nd amendment from lawful citizens, it’s about control.

Since most the murders happen in democrat cities. How about they don’t try to tell us how to lower murder rates ? Maybe if they didn’t defund the police and honor criminals, that might me a good start.

It’s weird liberals think they have a solution when their examples have shown otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This idea that democrat cities are where the murders happen has been wrong for 2 decades: https://www.thirdway.org/report/the-red-state-murder-problem