Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers

558 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

821

A Reddit User Admitted To Pirating a Movie 12 Years Ago. Movie Studios Want To Unmask Him. (reclaimthenet.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In what appears to be an escalating incursion into a user’s digital privacy, a collective of film companies continue to implore the court to compel Reddit to surrender its users’ personal details. This move is part of an ongoing piracy liability case against Internet Service Providers. Reddit, however, steadfastly resists, staunchly defending its users’ rights to anonymous speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think ISP's have any duty to prevent piracy, or anything else for that matter. Their business is providing internet to their customers, not policing each and every action

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you use encryption (I always change the settings from "prefer" to "require" encryption on every install), the ISPs literally can't identify what you're downloading.

So the IP enforcement companies send the ISP a letter saying "this IP was illegally downloading our stuff. We don't actually have proof, but trust us and punish them."

Big surprise, a ton of ISPs just ignore them.

Edit: to be clear, I'm only saying encryption prevents your ISP from seeing what you're downloading. IP (intellectual property) enforcers who participate in the torrent are the ones who inform your ISP, but their letters to the ISPs have no teeth. Some ISPs care, but a lot just ignore the letters. You still definitely want to use a VPN for all public trackers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think that's true. I'm pretty certain they simply hop on a torrent client with an illegal torrent for their movie and record the IP addresses they see seeding and leeching. Then simply compel the responsible ISP to reveal which of their customers currently has that IP leased.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339 4 points 1 year ago

That is exactly what happens. Encryption on the protocol doesn't do anything but hide what you're downloading from your ISP. It doesn't prevent someone from downloading the same torrent and matching your IP to it. That's why people recommend that you use VPNs if you're going to do this from your house.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's what I said though.

Your ISP can't see what you're downloading if you encrypt, but the IP (intellectual property) enforcers still can if they're participating in the torrent. Then they find out which ISP that IP (address) belongs to and sends them a letter saying "we caught your subscriber downloading XYZ illegally."

However, at least one US district court has ruled that just catching an IP address downloading a torrent illegally isn't proof that any particular person illegally downloaded the IP (intellectual property). As a result, some ISPs simply ignore the letters the IP enforcers send, while some of the bigger ones count "strikes" against the subscriber with that IP address.