this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
1112 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5204 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know what happened with my auto correct on that word as I think I meant to say "only" 🤔

Here's a longer list

And the original source is this website

https://unusualwhales.com/

2021: https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/full

2022: https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/congress-trading-report-2022

2023: https://unusualwhales.com/politics/article/congress-trading-report-2023

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Thanks! This completly debunks the insider trade myth. You would expect a Gaussian distribution around the mean, which would be a market neutral index. And you get even a slightly to the left shifted Gaussian bell curve.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah, well there you go then... 25ish people out of 535?

Again, it'd be worrying if the same people were consistently ahead of the market... but that would also be super obvious.

[–] Kecessa 8 points 5 months ago

Yep, people make a big thing out of it and maybe the proportion of them that beat SPY is higher than the proportion of random investors that do it, but there's no good way to say 🤷