this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
1112 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5204 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nehal3m 30 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Brb, programming a bot to copy these ghouls' investments.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The latency is too much. By the time us plebs get the data, it's all accounted for

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Right they do it before the laws are passed!

[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There are two ETFs that do this already. NANC and KRUZ

[–] nehal3m 26 points 5 months ago

LOL those names are instant classics.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago

There's like a week or so delay in them having to report trades, by then you've missed the profit, drive there's up a little, and when they sell it drops the price because they have a bunch of shares.

A week later you find out they sold, maybe make a slight profit if your fast. Then you hear what they bought a week and go give them even more money.

Because all the extra money following them, them selling a company could domino into real world consequences at the company like layoffs.

The system is broken. We're past the point of "gaming" it for scraps. We need a better system or we're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

People have already tried and failed doing exactly that. Because they aren’t required to report their trades when they’re making them; There’s a significant gap in reporting, so by the time the trade gets reported the stock has already increased/decreased like the congressperson expected.

For instance, let’s say [Generic Congressperson] sees a bill that will help a particular company. They know this bill is going to pass. So they buy stock in the company, vote for the bill, and the stock goes up. They then sell the stock. Three months later, those trades get reported. And now it’s too late, because the company’s stock has already been boosted. So buying now would just be buying after the boost.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is quiet a bet. All congress members are distributed in a Gaussian distribution around the S&P 500. So copying everyone would just give you the same average. So you would have to pick the members, who outperform consistently. But this changes year over year. For example Pelosi outperformed in 2023, but underperformed in 2022.

And at that point you could just buy individual stocks – or even better: stick to a market neutral ETF.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

just pick one that

outperformed every year, or
sits in the right comittees, or
is republican or
is most likely to be corrupt (e.g. gets the most corporate donations)

and you can limit yourself to the stocks that are relevant to their positions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure there’s a website that tracks this stuff, job half done.