this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
231 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38553 readers
2678 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahead of the expected announcement that Saudi Arabia will be appointed chair of the UN women’s rights forum at the annual meeting of the UN Commission of the Status of Women today, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for Advocacy, Sherine Tadros, said:

“The Commission on the Status of Women has a clear mandate to promote women’s rights and gender equality and it is vital for the chair of the commission to uphold this. Saudi Arabia’s abysmal record when it comes to protecting and promoting the rights of women puts a spotlight on the vast gulf between the lived reality for women and girls in Saudi Arabia, and the aspirations of the Commission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So, why exactly?

The UN cannot be THAT dumb, they must understand how this looks and will work... Are they hoping thst, lastinute, SA will get their shit together and decides to treat women like human beings? Doubtful, this is not a Hollywood movie.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

These things are voted on by the member countries. How many of them have regressive theocratic governments?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Indeed. How well do you think this will go?

And again, how do you think it looks? The optics are just sad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Clearly it's a shitty move that will harm vulnerable people.

Of course it looks bad, and I'm not trying to excuse it.

Just explaining that it wasn't some burocratic decision by a cabal of scheming administrators to fuck people over.

This is the actions of specific (mostly threocratic) countries.