this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
231 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38553 readers
2678 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahead of the expected announcement that Saudi Arabia will be appointed chair of the UN women’s rights forum at the annual meeting of the UN Commission of the Status of Women today, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for Advocacy, Sherine Tadros, said:

“The Commission on the Status of Women has a clear mandate to promote women’s rights and gender equality and it is vital for the chair of the commission to uphold this. Saudi Arabia’s abysmal record when it comes to protecting and promoting the rights of women puts a spotlight on the vast gulf between the lived reality for women and girls in Saudi Arabia, and the aspirations of the Commission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Haha, the UN is such a joke.

They must do this stuff on purpose for the lols, no way a legitimate group that means well would actually put Saudi Arabia in charge of gender equality.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago

It runs democratically. That means it is possible to subvert it with calculated strategic maneuvering.

The only alternative would be if it were some authoritarian global government, which is what most of us don't actually want, incidentally.

I never understand how people think any form of government or institution is supposed to work properly, unless people fight for it to do so. All things are potentially corruptible if we let it happen. All systems eventually, at some point, end up hinging on the honor system. And the simpler the system is, the easier it is to corrupt. If it was an absolutist monarchy, all you'd need to corrupt would be the king. Just one person. Very simple.