Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Didn't I already ask you to tone down the race stuff? I appreciate the content, but Id rather avoid this kind of stuff. TBH, I dont know if this is starting to cross the line into racism or if its just being bothered by racism or what.
Man, I hate judgement calls.
Lol you don't like the blatantly racist bullshit your blatantly racist subscribers post?
Maybe you should stop working with the racist party.
We don’t work with the democrats. It’s obvious the professor is not a republican.
Right, which is why she is correct in calling out racism. And then the respondent in that "article" goes on to spout the "family values" that you all like to parrot.
Your fifth grade tier insult makes you look suuuuuper smart lemme tell ya.
Imaginary racism isn't racism. I doubt you read the article, but it's mainly a world salad of hot garbage. Maybe read the actual study to see what it's about? What point of hers do you expressly agree with?
The Democrats are the ones who are racist as her article clearly calls out. They are the ones who created most of what she is complaining about.
Of course it's hot garbage, it's faux "news."
Have you read it? Just because someone finds systemic racism and expresses thoughts about it does not make them racist. But that doesn't fit the narrative you've been taught to parrot.
What does Fox News have to do with study? The study is hot garbage.
She didn’t find much. She created. The solution is remove welfare program and we solve her complaints. I’m all for that.
Yea your kind love to see underprivileged and disabled people starve.
The selfishness and cruelty gets you off, doesn't it?
It would solve her issue. We have charities that could serve the poor without government intervention. Now democrats don’t give to charities as much we conservatives but that’s a side note.
Lmfao. "charities" as in churches that enjoy tax benefits whilst promoting a fascist piece of shit traitor and only helping those who will accept their theocratic bullshit.
That sounds like Made up bullshit.
I’ve yet to see a church promote Biden, or require anyone to accept religion for charity.
Can you show where the Catholic Church has done any of things you claim ?
Haha you must be in fifth grade with that tier of "nuh-uh no you."
We the majority all know that trump is the fascist piece of shit who tried to overthrow our constitution on Jan 6th. We all saw it live. You cant distort that reality no matter how hard you bleat his lies.
His magats are the exact opposite of patriotic Americans, and deserve nothing less than deportation as the active enemies of the United States.
You saw something very different than what I saw.
Right, your forced ignorance wouldn't allow you to see the REALITY of that filthy fucking traitor trying to get his magats terrorists to overthrow an election, all based on ABSOLUTE LIES that were PROVEN to be false by SIXTY court cases, all thrown out because there was ZERO basis.
Magats aren't american anymore. They are the enemies of every single American patriot.
lol. So a weird response.
The issue I see is it’s about the culture war but not tied to an event or policy. It’s the ranting of one professor.
So it should just be ignored that leftists are using universities to push their garbage?
One professor is not the teachings of a university. Has the university put out a statement agreeing with her? Has the department head said anything? All I see is a statement from one teacher.
If I went and used my position as a federal employee to sling this type of political shit, I'd be out a job. It's not exactly like the university is in the dark about what this teacher is doing.
You are against free speech? Or just speech you don’t like? She isn’t tenured but this is why tenure is important.
Did you read her research or just form an opinion based on the headline ?
She's free to say whatever she likes, and the university is free to keep slime like her on. And similarly, I'm free to judge them based on their own speech.
Read he study. The best solution to her complaints is end social programs. That would solve her complaints. End tanf, social security, etc and get complaints go away.
Fucking as if. Her type will always find new shit to cry about. Just because she accidentally stumbled into a good idea once it doesn't mean she deserves respect
she appears to be for expanding the programs which is stupid since it would increase cost and still wouldn't produce the results she wants.
Social Security is a Ponzai scam. She wants to allow you to give it to anyone. That way it's not tied to marriage. Imagine handing down social security benefits from generation to generation or to strangers. The program is meant to stop when you die, or your spouse dies. That is one control on cost.
TANF is a cash program. The government shouldn't be taking cash from me to give to anyone else. That is just a failed system right there.
We know that traditional nuclear families produce the best outcomes. We should only support families in that mode.
Some of her rant is unironically racist but I doubt anyone read the study or would pick up on it.
Sorry, I misread your earlier comment as you saying she supported ending those programs. As such, I retract my acknowledgement that she's right about anything, and return to my original stance of full condemnation.
You make a good point. Its why Im hesistant. Its clearly about CRT and CRT-adjacent thinking, so Im thinking it should stay up.