Intel

0 readers
0 users here now

https://discord.gg/intelsubreddit /r/Intel is the community-run subreddit to talk about anything related to Intel Corporation and it's products....

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/ShaidarHaran2 on 2023-12-21 23:26:17+00:00.

2
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/ShaidarHaran2 on 2023-12-21 23:26:17+00:00.

3
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/IrisUHD on 2023-12-21 23:12:42+00:00.

4
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/IrisUHD on 2023-12-21 23:12:42+00:00.

5
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/Grand_Feature_1431 on 2023-12-21 22:57:32+00:00.


So my laptops specs re

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ RAM: 16GB GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB

I bought call of duty mw3 few days ago. When playing it I managed to optimise it so my gpu would not heat up as much, now it stays at 75/78 Celsius But the problem is that my cpu gets up to max 100 Celsius and stays at 98 Celsius when playing. If I use ventilator that connects to laptop it goes down to 95 Celsius. Is there a high risk of damaging my cpu? Any tips to make it run colder? Or is it just that the game is to new for my pc.

6
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/Grand_Feature_1431 on 2023-12-21 22:57:32+00:00.


So my laptops specs re

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ RAM: 16GB GPU: nVidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB

I bought call of duty mw3 few days ago. When playing it I managed to optimise it so my gpu would not heat up as much, now it stays at 75/78 Celsius But the problem is that my cpu gets up to max 100 Celsius and stays at 98 Celsius when playing. If I use ventilator that connects to laptop it goes down to 95 Celsius. Is there a high risk of damaging my cpu? Any tips to make it run colder? Or is it just that the game is to new for my pc.

7
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/gotchaday on 2023-12-21 20:44:22+00:00.

8
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/gotchaday on 2023-12-21 20:44:22+00:00.

9
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/AristotelesQC on 2023-12-21 17:33:38+00:00.

Original Title: I set my 14900K power limits to 125 W (PL1 = PL2) following TechPowerUp and Puget Systems articles and wow, it's almost as fast in 99% of scenarios I encounter, it runs cool and my fans are nearly silent with a slight undervolt. This is now my daily driver!


The performance difference in my creative apps I use professionally (Capture One and Photoshop, mostly) is negligible. I also do some occasional gaming at 4K with a 3080 Ti and the performance there is negligible too, especially since my main monitor is 60Hz and I cap it in most games anyway.

I ran a few Cinebench tests (sorry, no screenshots) and I had scores around 1800-1900, while my best score was around 2200 at the "stock" 280 W PL1 power limit on my motherboard. Running a Linpack 2021 stress test in OCCT gives me core temps of around 50 C, according to HWiNFO64. With the default "optimized" profile from my motherboard, I had temps in the high 80s, low 90s.

All in all, for a 224 % power reduction I get at worse a 22 % penalty in heavy all-core multithreaded AVX2 workloads that I pretty much almost never run anyway, while I get near zero loss of performance in single or more lightly threaded applications (most of my usage).

I also get about a reduction of 80 % in heat, which translates to silence, noise being much neglected variable when discussing CPU performance IMO. I set all of my case and radiator fans to 50 % baseline, where they are barely audible, then they ramp up quickly from 51 % at 60 C to 100 % at 70 C but that almost never happens. Restricting the PL2 (and not just the PL1) limit to 125 W also means that I don't have temperature spikes following a boost that would cause a quick fan ramp up.

For those interested, here are my CPU settings in XTU (I could set those in the BIOS too, but since I can't save profiles on my mobo and I had to clear the CMOS a handful of times after trying various RAM overclocks, I much prefer the software route).

  • First, I set my motherboard to its lowest OC profile (because all "default" profiles are some kind of "tweaking" or overclocking), which is "Spec Enhance" with my Gigabyte board.
  • I then loaded the default profile in XTU, which changed a few things from the base motherboard, but it was close enough. This is to get a starting point at the base Intel spec.

Now, the settings I tweaked:

  • Turbo Boost Power Max (PL1): 125,000 W
  • Turbo Boost Short Power Max (PL2): 125,000 W
  • Core Voltage Offset: -0,035 V (I'm still trying to lower this, but so far I've had good stability with 35 mV)
  • Processor Core IccMax: 307,00 A (This was unlocked by default but I read that the 14900K specs are rated at 307 A max, so I set this limit). XTU sometimes tells me that I get current throttling, but it doesn't happen frequently. I guess it still helps slightly with the overall temps.
  • AVX2 Ratio Offset: 0,0x. I don't want to gimp my CPU any further since I am already limiting its max current, max power, ad undervolting it.

And that's pretty much it!

Here are some relevant specs of my PC, because I guess these matter too when it comes to temps and stability:

  • Corsair Carbide Series Air 540 case with the stock fans stripped out of it
  • Corsair HX1500i power supply (below 50 % load its fan turns off, this is a great feature)
  • 3x 120 mm front intake fans, 1x 140 mm rear exhaust fan, all Noctua
  • Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite X Wifi 7 motherboard
  • 14900K CPU (of course) with the Thermalright LGA 1700 contact frame and Arctic MX-6 thermal paste applied on it (cake frosting method)
  • Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 AIO, mounted on top in its default push configuration
  • 2x 48 GB Corsair Dominator Titanium 6600 DDR5 running at 6800 with the "XMP 2" profile
  • MSI 3080 Ti Gaming X 12G (very silent GPU, pairs well with the rest of my system)

Links to the articles mentioned in the title :

Intel Core i9-14900K Raptor Lake Tested at Power Limits Down to 35 W - Temperatures | TechPowerUp

Power Draw and Cooling: Intel Core 14th Gen Processors | Puget Systems

10
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/AristotelesQC on 2023-12-21 17:33:38+00:00.

Original Title: I set my 14900K power limits to 125 W (PL1 = PL2) following TechPowerUp and Puget Systems articles and wow, it's almost as fast in 99% of scenarios I encounter, it runs cool and my fans are nearly silent with a slight undervolt. This is now my daily driver!


The performance difference in my creative apps I use professionally (Capture One and Photoshop, mostly) is negligible. I also do some occasional gaming at 4K with a 3080 Ti and the performance there is negligible too, especially since my main monitor is 60Hz and I cap it in most games anyway.

I ran a few Cinebench tests (sorry, no screenshots) and I had scores around 1800-1900, while my best score was around 2200 at the "stock" 280 W PL1 power limit on my motherboard. Running a Linpack 2021 stress test in OCCT gives me core temps of around 50 C, according to HWiNFO64. With the default "optimized" profile from my motherboard, I had temps in the high 80s, low 90s.

All in all, for a 224 % power reduction I get at worse a 22 % penalty in heavy all-core multithreaded AVX2 workloads that I pretty much almost never run anyway, while I get near zero loss of performance in single or more lightly threaded applications (most of my usage).

I also get about a reduction of 80 % in heat, which translates to silence, noise being much neglected variable when discussing CPU performance IMO. I set all of my case and radiator fans to 50 % baseline, where they are barely audible, then they ramp up quickly from 51 % at 60 C to 100 % at 70 C but that almost never happens. Restricting the PL2 (and not just the PL1) limit to 125 W also means that I don't have temperature spikes following a boost that would cause a quick fan ramp up.

For those interested, here are my CPU settings in XTU (I could set those in the BIOS too, but since I can't save profiles on my mobo and I had to clear the CMOS a handful of times after trying various RAM overclocks, I much prefer the software route).

  • First, I set my motherboard to its lowest OC profile (because all "default" profiles are some kind of "tweaking" or overclocking), which is "Spec Enhance" with my Gigabyte board.
  • I then loaded the default profile in XTU, which changed a few things from the base motherboard, but it was close enough. This is to get a starting point at the base Intel spec.

Now, the settings I tweaked:

  • Turbo Boost Power Max (PL1): 125,000 W
  • Turbo Boost Short Power Max (PL2): 125,000 W
  • Core Voltage Offset: -0,035 V (I'm still trying to lower this, but so far I've had good stability with 35 mV)
  • Processor Core IccMax: 307,00 A (This was unlocked by default but I read that the 14900K specs are rated at 307 A max, so I set this limit). XTU sometimes tells me that I get current throttling, but it doesn't happen frequently. I guess it still helps slightly with the overall temps.
  • AVX2 Ratio Offset: 0,0x. I don't want to gimp my CPU any further since I am already limiting its max current, max power, ad undervolting it.

And that's pretty much it!

Here are some relevant specs of my PC, because I guess these matter too when it comes to temps and stability:

  • Corsair Carbide Series Air 540 case with the stock fans stripped out of it
  • Corsair HX1500i power supply (below 50 % load its fan turns off, this is a great feature)
  • 3x 120 mm front intake fans, 1x 140 mm rear exhaust fan, all Noctua
  • Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite X Wifi 7 motherboard
  • 14900K CPU (of course) with the Thermalright LGA 1700 contact frame and Arctic MX-6 thermal paste applied on it (cake frosting method)
  • Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 AIO, mounted on top in its default push configuration
  • 2x 48 GB Corsair Dominator Titanium 6600 DDR5 running at 6800 with the "XMP 2" profile
  • MSI 3080 Ti Gaming X 12G (very silent GPU, pairs well with the rest of my system)

Links to the articles mentioned in the title :

Intel Core i9-14900K Raptor Lake Tested at Power Limits Down to 35 W - Temperatures | TechPowerUp

Power Draw and Cooling: Intel Core 14th Gen Processors | Puget Systems

11
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/Championship_Rea on 2023-12-21 17:27:04+00:00.


The title is pretty self explanatory. How good is Intel IRISX graphics, especially for gaming? The gaming for me are games like GTA V, Red Dead Redemption 2 and maybe Roblox because of my 5 year old cousin. I know it is good for Youtube videos since I watch them daily, but I would like to know how good it is about gaming.

Some extra info:

CPU: Intel I5 11th Gen

RAM: 16GB

Storage: 512 GB NVME SSD

CPU Speed: 4.1 GHZ

Type of RAM: DDR4

12
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/Championship_Rea on 2023-12-21 17:27:04+00:00.


The title is pretty self explanatory. How good is Intel IRISX graphics, especially for gaming? The gaming for me are games like GTA V, Red Dead Redemption 2 and maybe Roblox because of my 5 year old cousin. I know it is good for Youtube videos since I watch them daily, but I would like to know how good it is about gaming.

Some extra info:

CPU: Intel I5 11th Gen

RAM: 16GB

Storage: 512 GB NVME SSD

CPU Speed: 4.1 GHZ

Type of RAM: DDR4

13
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/GoblinGobussyEnjoyer on 2023-12-21 17:09:58+00:00.


So I got a defective i9-13900k and essentially I had to turn off turbo boost to get it to work. (Apparently a semi-common problem with this chip) if I had turbo boost on it would crash programs randomly, interfere with windows updates, just cause all sorts of issues.

I RMA'd the chip and recently got my new i9 13900k in the mail and I noticed stuff runs a lot smoother. Just how big of an impact does turbo boost make in these chips?

14
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/GoblinGobussyEnjoyer on 2023-12-21 17:09:58+00:00.


So I got a defective i9-13900k and essentially I had to turn off turbo boost to get it to work. (Apparently a semi-common problem with this chip) if I had turbo boost on it would crash programs randomly, interfere with windows updates, just cause all sorts of issues.

I RMA'd the chip and recently got my new i9 13900k in the mail and I noticed stuff runs a lot smoother. Just how big of an impact does turbo boost make in these chips?

15
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/WVCoop10 on 2023-12-21 13:54:29+00:00.


Question about undervolting: (XTU)

I haven’t done any undervolting in a few years. I watched several videos to freshen up my knowledge and basically everyone using XTU ONLY adjusts the core voltage offset? Like every single YouTube video I watched, they lowered the core voltage offset and stress tested and that was it. Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t you also need to lower the Processor cache ratio (P cache) and Efficient cores cache voltage offset (e cache?)

I’m trying to figure out what to do because on this i9 13900HX, if I only lower the core voltage offset, I can get it down to like -0.210V.

If I also drop the E cache and P cache, I can only get it down to like -0.140 V with the P and E caches at -0.090 V.

If there is no point in lowering the caches, I won’t do it to give me more headroom for core voltage undervolt.

Help please from an expert!

16
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/WVCoop10 on 2023-12-21 13:54:29+00:00.


Question about undervolting: (XTU)

I haven’t done any undervolting in a few years. I watched several videos to freshen up my knowledge and basically everyone using XTU ONLY adjusts the core voltage offset? Like every single YouTube video I watched, they lowered the core voltage offset and stress tested and that was it. Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t you also need to lower the Processor cache ratio (P cache) and Efficient cores cache voltage offset (e cache?)

I’m trying to figure out what to do because on this i9 13900HX, if I only lower the core voltage offset, I can get it down to like -0.210V.

If I also drop the E cache and P cache, I can only get it down to like -0.140 V with the P and E caches at -0.090 V.

If there is no point in lowering the caches, I won’t do it to give me more headroom for core voltage undervolt.

Help please from an expert!

17
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/brand_momentum on 2023-12-21 12:45:51+00:00.

18
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/brand_momentum on 2023-12-21 12:45:51+00:00.

19
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/Zurpx on 2023-12-21 11:38:19+00:00.

20
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/cebri1 on 2023-12-21 08:27:15+00:00.


Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 155H Review (changes in comments)

| BIOS / Model | W | 10m Loop CB23 MT Test | |


|


|


| | B201 | 28 | 11342 pts | | B203 | 28 | 12132 pts | | Delta B203 vs B201 | | +7% | | i7-1360P | 28 | 9423 pts (notebookcheck) | | Delta B203 vs I7-1360p | | +28% | | Ryzen 7 7840U | 28 | 12225 pts (notebookcheck) | | Delta B203 vs 7840U | | < 1% |

Still needs to be confirmed by other media outlets. CB23 test may differ between outlets.

21
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/cebri1 on 2023-12-21 08:27:15+00:00.


Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 155H Review (changes in comments)

| BIOS / Model | W | 10m Loop CB23 MT Test | |


|


|


| | B201 | 28 | 11342 pts | | B203 | 28 | 12132 pts | | Delta B203 vs B201 | | +7% | | i7-1360P | 28 | 9423 pts (notebookcheck) | | Delta B203 vs I7-1360p | | +28% | | Ryzen 7 7840U | 28 | 12225 pts (notebookcheck) | | Delta B203 vs 7840U | | < 1% |

Still needs to be confirmed by other media outlets. CB23 test may differ between outlets.

22
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/bizude on 2023-12-20 16:12:51+00:00.

23
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/bizude on 2023-12-20 16:12:51+00:00.

24
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/bizude on 2023-12-20 14:11:37+00:00.

25
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/intel by /u/bizude on 2023-12-20 03:51:40+00:00.

view more: next ›