If you said, "I disagree bc this historical event is an example of fascism coming from a non-liberal origin"... then yes, that would have been literally what you said. But that's not what you said. So why say that's literally what you said? It literally is not lol
whoreticulture
joined 4 months ago
Do you? ArcGIS and navigating in the field are not the same thing. I assume you don't, or else you wouldn't have brought up a tangentially related skill?
You're just saying my mind is made up because you don't have anything to contribute to the discussion lol
this guy is a grade-A brainwashee
Do you go outside and use the maps? And navigate in the field with a compass? I am sorry but yes, obviously using a computer program is going to be somewhat similar to playing a video game.
Making maps and using maps are not the same skills.
It's marginal utility is not worth the energy expenditures.
It's not that you read, it's that you name drop books and knowledge instead of incorporating them into a discussion. And your self-defensive posture of "well SORRY for READING" is like the oldest trick in the manipulator's book.
It's not that you read, it's that you brag about reading in a way that doesn't contribute to the conversation. It's not that you responded, it's that you responded in a way that turned the suggestion into a pissing match of who has read what.
I'm telling you this, but I'm sure you know this because you probably do this all the time to give yourself an ego boost.