48
Your ideas are overly aggressive, even just leaving. Just change the topic or say "I'd rather not discuss this at work."
lmao I thought for a second this was just your comment about the situation, not your advice on what to say
Adderall isn't an approved medication outside of the United States though, and it's the only drug that works for me. Plus... I'm already having a hard enough time. You need tens of thousands saved up to even afford a move, and then go through the immigration process? All that paperwork? Obviously there are better safety nets outside of the United States but most people privileged enough to afford to leave would also be in less need of a safety net.
Basically, this is terrible advice lmao
It's objectively weird in the sense that most people don't do that.
Yeah, there's an interest in Y2K era tech amongst some gen-Z people. I think it's cool, idk why you're hating.
I can't think of a single thing AI does that is worth the amount of energy consumption.
I don't like this meme because the last two panels don't rhyme.
I can't imagine something more awkward than having to explicitly deny someone based on looks after having a good conversation.
What do they mean "trap laid by the right". These college administrators are conservatives.
23
This is why Harvey Milk made everyone come out to their parents. It's unfortunate, but the only way some people are able to experience empathy is through directly knowing someone. Being out and proud is activism ... of course that doesn't come without risk.
3
To me, this headline was misleading. I assumed it was about funding campaigns, but this is for the actual process of voting itself.
The money was spent in a wide variety of ways — protective gear for poll workers, public education campaigns promoting new methods to vote during the pandemic, and new trucks to haul voting equipment.
The Republicans keep using the same strategy, restrict voting as much as possible. They won't adequately fund elections, and they are making it illegal for private funders to do so.
view more: next ›
It's not really dodging a conversation when you enter it being critical of the rhetoric, and not the content. I don't think anyone is fooled but I think you are confused.