wheeldawg

joined 2 years ago
[–] wheeldawg 5 points 1 week ago

Better question is "would the son have voted for Trump?". Then laugh at him if he would have, but not until then.

As it stands, the better take is not to laugh at him, but to laugh and fully enjoy the parents' pain about the situation. Savor it.

My parents did not for him, and I will probably smear it in their face immediately if it ever directly affects them. But we're white, fully naturalized people who live in a red area, so it will probably take a while. I only voted red once, right after becoming old enough and before I started to break free if the super tight bubble they kept me in.

But they never had a clue until this election, and they were shocked.

They usually like to nitpick with me now over bits of news that they think sounds good for them or bad for me. Now after these 100 days, they haven't said a peep.

I don't bring it up much because for the time being I have to depend on them due to medical issues. But I should be ready to get back out within 2 years and I will not be quiet then.

[–] wheeldawg 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lol it kinda is.

[–] wheeldawg 8 points 2 weeks ago

It wasn't meant as a judgement. Just a different way of phrasing how it's typically used, or generally used. I guess it does kinda sound judgy, tho.

I was raised in a very red place and I am still finding pieces of it left behind after leaving it. In this case, word choice. I really didn't mean it as any kind of insult or anything, but I really did mean "should" as in "typically", not "ought to".

Thanks for the answer. Most boomers I've ever known wouldn't even ask, so I guess I'm still not as bad as them 😅

I am "Internet old" tho.

[–] wheeldawg 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

One time I loved with my roommate... and his ex wife. It was sort of amicable (obviously), but sometimes the arguments weren't. I usually stayed out of it if possible, but sometimes not.

And sometimes when it was lower stakes I would just poke at them for fun.

[–] wheeldawg 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honest question.

I have never heard of (or seen) wearing a belt underneath wear your shirt would cover, and on top of that, not wearing one where it should go.

Am I a boomer, or what is happening? Is this some kinda trend now?

Help me understand.

[–] wheeldawg 2 points 2 weeks ago

That Daytona looked like the KITT you had at home tho. Still looked pretty cool. I know nothing about the car at all, but I like the look of it.

[–] wheeldawg 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ahh yes, the episode that was basically the same plot as the first movie.

[–] wheeldawg -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmao

This isn't meeting the level of importance for me.

[–] wheeldawg 6 points 3 weeks ago

If they have a badge and I get away with it, yeah. Especially an ICE badge. Traffic cops have done some good. But I can't remember hearing any story about ICE that was about them doing anything positive, ever.

Watch the life drain from their dead eyes and know some good was done as I have purified the evil trained into their husk like a cancer.

Everybody wins.

But shooting people in general? Nah. Personally speaking, anyway. I don't even have a gun myself.

I feel the opposite goes for conservatives. They'll shoot anyone they can argue they felt threatened by. But they'll lick ICE boots on request.

[–] wheeldawg 4 points 3 weeks ago

Who is answering these polls, exactly?

[–] wheeldawg 3 points 3 weeks ago

Didn't leave the "ragrets"ers out!

view more: ‹ prev next ›