turnip

Well I mean he's the lefts guy. Not that he's actually progressive, he definitely didn't give a shot about the housing bubble when he was the governor of the BoC.

They said the same thing about every Republican as what they say about Trump. If you live your entire life in hyperbole people get desensitized.

There's a great book called sum: forty tales from the afterlife I read recently that is great. If you're looking for suggestions.

Thats our monetary policy. People must consume more every year to create more inflation, as technology actively reduces the price of goods.

If goods get cheaper we have deflation, they create more money supply via lower interest rates, and the price of inelastic shelter gets bid up, and asset holders receive a value windfall until prices rise. Which is why we are at a higher price to income ratio than 2007.

People born closer to the gold standard are richer, they got in when currency wasnt tethered to consumption.

Carney said he was going to cut 28b in government spending via AI. If that isn't DOGE in a nutshell I don't know what is.

At the same time we will have nearly double the immigration numbers the Cons want, into an extreme housing shortage. Specifically a 1% cap of 430k, making them the party of cheap corporate labor.

All great things if you own equities and assets, but if you're poor you get a yearly 500$ dental check funded entirely by debt and future austerity, as they've already rolled back the capital gains hikes.

Doomberg says he thinks he wants Carney to win, since the only way a pipeline is getting built to Europe is if a left leaning government does it.

Though even Sysadmin is going to be managing a SaaS cloud service or a self managed docker container on an automatically provisioned hyperconverged SAN, so its going to be obsolete in a decade. Chromebooks are where we are headed, and Google also saw the future a decade ago.

Yet theyre against mutilating genitals when it comes to trans people.

Go ahead and produce a dye for them, nobody is stopping you.

He would be the first person in modern history to cut the government if he succeeded, even Reagan didn't despite the rhetoric. I think Clinton had the end of the Soviets which I am not counting.

Though if you asked these people if they felt they should have higher taxes to pay for it, due to aging demographics and higher borrowing rates, they would say no as well. So what do you do?

You still get banned here too. The mods can disagree politically and just ban you as they can on reddit.

I don't believe in pushing any stereotypes in aggregate. Just as I wouldn't say he was a Chinese Commie who can't drive.