overview for tmjaea

Ericsson Struggles with Huawei's Dominance in European Telecom Market Despite Ban - EconoTimes by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Where Nokia?

Ernährung: Pflanzenöle sind wirklich gesünder als Butter by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Kannst du das etwas erläutern?

*Permanently Deleted* by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

Hätte er mal nebenbei noch ein paar Monaten Milliarden Euro Steuern hinterzogen, dann hätte man die Ermittlungen eingestellt

Pornhub to leave five more states over age-verification laws by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago

Ironically their leader pays porn stars to have sex with him which obviously is not a problem for their voters.

Rassistische Straftaten: Ein besonders schlimmes Wochenende in MV by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 39 points 4 weeks ago

So und wohin schieben wir die Täter jetzt ab Herr Scholz? Und wer zum fick ist so am Sack, dass er einem Grundschulkind mit dem Fuß ins Gesicht tritt? Dieser Abschaum widert mich so unfassbar an.

What’s the best ad blocker for you? - Firefox Add-ons Blog by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago

Nah, they tried to sell their own "non-intrusive" ads after blocking the sites' ads.

I AM SO DISAPPOINTED WITH UBUNTU 24.04 😡 by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

Even apt is deliberately broken:

"[If] You use 'sudo apt install chromium', you get a Snap package of Chromium instead of Debian"

ich🇨🇦iel by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Also bei Ahornsirup hört der Spaß auf, jetzt müssen wir dann doch mal was gegen die Klimakatastrophe tun

ich🚫iel by tmjaea in c/[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Aber die Grünen sind doch die Verbotspartei?!

24

Weird 10Gbe networking problems (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink

Hi,

I've got a network setup consisting of 3 proxmox servers of which two have a 10Gbe interface. All interfaces are RJ45 copper ports.

So far I've got two qnap switches with 2 10Gbe and 5 2.5Gbe portss. They are connected to each other via one of the 10Gbe ports, and one of the servers on the other one.

This setup is working flawlessly, iperf measurements show 9.4gbit/s in both directions.

Recently I tried to increase my network for future expansion and bought a trendnet switch with 5 10Gbe ports.

Weird problems occurred and as they were also described in some amazon reviews I returned the switch and bought another one, this time a 4port 10Gbe switch from ubiquity.

Again there are problems. This time one direction seems to be at 10gbit/s as expected while the other direction (between the same two servers) is limited to 1gbit/s. The connection to the third server shows the same problem (one direction 2.5gbit/s and the other one limited to 1gbit/s).

All wires are connected correctly and as there is no problem on the qnap switches I do believe that there is no hardware problem on the cable/NIC side.

However I'm not sure if this is this just bad luck or some deep network problem I don't understand.

Maybe someone has an idea?

83

Ostdeutschland: "Da denkst du doch nur: Ich geh jetzt. Ich geh jetzt sofort" | ZEIT Campus (www.zeit.de)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink

Heat pumps can't take the cold? Nordics debunk the myth by tmjaea in c/[email protected]