But what is their incentive to make this feature to begin with? Who is it really for?
Edit: this is more of rhetorical question I guess. To rephrase it a bit to get closer to my point: who is the browser designed for? For the person using the browser? For the website owner? For advertisers?
While I’m not hating on Mozilla it still warrant a discussion.
Won’t they just use both this new feature and the classic way of tracking you, now having more data than before.
Wow, that is sad.
Isn’t this the opposite of global news?
The system would be fair if it was both positive and negative tips. Then at least I would consider tipping. It’s a but rude otherwise.
Is this actually something that Fox News aired, or some form of satire?
Looks cool. Probably expected for this type of display but I thought it was interesting the refresh rate was 19 seconds.
Yeah, strange design choice since the other buttons in theUI are not pill shaped.
Aside from that things look very nice.
The Americans might be right on this one. Perhaps if we give them this one they will give us the metric system.
Would you mind clarifying what you think is misleading in the title?
There are so many things you can do between nothing and full on invasion. Your question cannot possibly be in good faith.
But why appease advertisers, I don’t see the point? The current ad business only exists because it’s been possible to track people. It does not mean it’s impossible to do advertising without it. It’s not like it’s a right for advertisers to know in detail how their ads are performing.
Why wouldn’t Mozilla just disable all tracking? Why do they see any need to give anything back when minimizing another form of tracking?