I think it depends on the type of software. Subscriptions do make sense for software that requires regular updates, e.g. something tax related, where you need it updated with the latest regulations every year. Basically for anything that won't be useful a year from the purchase date without feature updates.
A good rule of thumb is that if you have heard of a brand but don't remember anything positive about them they should probably be dead to you.
And imagine if products that couldn't get by on their own merits without ads wouldn't exist at all. How much more productive and happy our society would be if we got rid of useless products and the negative feelings ads induce when we don't have those useless products at the same time.
What they were doing before regulation prevented them from doing so was also capitalism, things like child labor, unsafe workplaces, company towns, violent strike breaking, war profiteering,...
This is not new, this is what always happens if you leave capitalism to decide what will happen. The only time it doesn't is when heavy regulation prevents it and then capitalism tries its best to bribe politicians, spew propaganda, seek legal loopholes and attempt regulatory capture.
Sounds a lot like gig economy for everyone.
And how do I get the prompt that will reliably generate the data from the data? Usually for compression we do not start from an already compressed version.
it ends in X and the CEO is the dumbest fuck alive? Must be one of Elon Musk's companies?
But literally any other form of energy generation can be deployed quicker and is cheaper and most are also less centralized.
Seems more like a proof of concept project for that paper than something they are pursuing seriously judging by the GitHub location in some example folder that hasn't seen any significant updates in over a year. If it is so great I would assume they would pursue it more actively and replace existing models with it two years later.
The idea that all new technologies are going to be successful just because some were in the past is just about the most ridiculous take in this entire thread.
I wouldn't say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources.