If most are reuploads anyway that kills the whole argument that deleting things works though.
It is only a job loss in the same sense that a lost future sale is a loss of sales. Someone having a job now does not entitle them to dictate that everyone else should keep spending on the industry they work in just so the jobs in that industry keep existing.
The last remnants of a connection to reality.
Even if we completely stop buying certain products people losing their jobs because of that is a stupid and manipulative argument.
If I e.g. do not buy a car (because I live in a walkable European city) that will likely lead to lost jobs in the car industry (as I am sure the lobbyists for that industry will point out publicly loudly and often) but it is not as if that money I would have spent on a car isn't spent on other things I wouldn't have been able to buy if I had to spend money on a car. So there are no job losses, just a redistribution of jobs between the industries on which I choose to spend my money.
Way ahead of them. I just buy stuff from other websites now without Amazon or AI involvement.
You are assuming the tariffs will stay in place for a predictable enough duration that anyone will invest in rerouting trade through those countries. That is very unlikely while Trump rolls the dice anew every other week.
Who said anything about punishing the people hosting the sites. I was talking about punishing the people uploading and producing the content. The ones doing the part that is orders of magnitude worse than anything else about this.
I am not talking about CSA, I am talking about video material of CSA. Most countries with marriage ages that low have much more wide-spread bans on videos including sex of any kind.
As for prosecution, yes, it is still illegal if it is not prosecuted. There are many reasons not to prosecute something ranging all the way from resource and other means related concerns to intentionally turning a blind eye and only a small minority of them would lead that country to actively sabotage a major international investigation, especially after the trade-offs are considered (such as loss of international reputation by refusing to cooperate).
Whatever you think it does it certainly doesn't get rid of SMTP, IMAP, RFC822, Quoted Printable and half a dozen other encodings only used in email, MIME/Multipart, email addresses that require 8000 character regular expressions to get anywhere close to validating the full spec, the ability to send mails to anyone by anyone or anything else I was talking about.
Just add an option to re-enable space bar heating.
Cookie banners are completely unnecessary as long as websites only use cookies for technically necessary purposes (e.g. login). The problem is that a lot of websites want to sell your data to hundreds or thousands of other companies. So yeah, we could cut back a lot of red tape there if we just outright banned that sale of data completely.
view more: next ›
If anything large US companies signaling a desire to buy would make it less likely that a sale actually happens. The awareness that social media has the ability to influence users politically is very much there now and nobody wants that all in the hands of one country, especially one as adversarial as the US.