superb

Telling people to just google it really discourages a lot of community.

why does criticizing a politician cause so many to [reflexively] defend them?

Probably because they disagree with you?

To be clear I agree with your criticisms, Kamala is 100% a cop. I disagree with you banning anyone who uses the word “vote” in their disagreement.

Kamala is the democratic candidate for president, anytime we talk about her we’re implicitly talking about the election. You can’t then turn around and ban anyone who then brings up the election. You brought it up first!

If you think “Kamala sucks” posts aren’t electioneering then I don’t know how to help you.

No, prosecutors prosecute. Prosecutors are not literally cops (duh), but they are a very important part of the criminal ”justice” system. Cops couldn’t put people away without their help

Don’t vote for candidate X is still electioneering?

Oh, what’s the joke I missed?

Yeah but the value of my money doesn’t swing rapidly daily, and transactions process in seconds instead of minutes to hours. Oh and it’s actually accepted as a form of payment at most institutions.

Bitcoin, and all other cryptocurrencies, are securities at best and straight gambling at worst.

What are you talking about? Bitcoin started this, it’s was the first scam. It’s all bad.

Take your winnings and get the fuck out of crypto ASAP

It’s probably $30k per year

This is definitely the instance for me. Thank you Ada!!

So in the court’s opinion, what if anything are the police obligated to do?

Oops, didn’t work for me I guess