sundevil311

@[email protected] Heard really good things about Zen. Might have to give it a spin.

Love the work you're doing on Notesnook! Keep it up the great work! 🫶

@notesnook Not sure if you're aware, but there's been a clarification added.
https://www.ghacks.net/2025/02/27/mozillas-new-terms-of-use-causes-confusion-among-firefox-users/

Again, I agree the wording is troubling. We'll have to see how this plays out. I feel like very little has changed, they've just updated their legal terms.

I, for one, won't be dropping @firefox. I already use Brave (and LibreFox and Cromite) as well for uncooperative websites and specific use cases.

If you're truly worried about this, I'd urge you to look into LibreFox or another fork.

@[email protected] @[email protected] I'll have to do more digging on the legal docs.

My point isn't necessarily to disable everything. You need to understand which toggles actually have an effect. This info is widely known for Firefox (hence projects like arkenfox and Betterfox).

It is troubling to see this sort of wording in a Mozilla policy.

Nothing against Brave, btw. If you insist on sticking to Chromium, it's not a bad option. I'd just hate to see Firefox lose more users, as it's the only alt to Chromium.

@[email protected] @[email protected] Simple solution: don't input or upload data to Firefox. If you need to sync bookmarks, use Floccus or Syncthing.

Disable search suggestions, AI, translation, etc. It's quite easy to avoid giving them data if you're willing to dive into the settings.

For the record, Brave takes even more work to disable that crap. I'm nearly certain Brave already has clauses like this. There's simply no way they could provide AI tools without them.

Fret not, @[email protected] is alive and well.