I think what people need are clear examples, concisely expressed, of the explicit harm experienced by forgoing a certain quanta of privacy, since the benefits are apparent (eg gain access to a certain service/community/etc).
smokeythebear
joined 1 year ago
Every single example of means testing has been more expensive than just distributing the benefits to the people that ask for them.
You know people can actually see conservatives actions when it comes to these positions and know you are lying?
Wasn't that later revealed to be a hoax? It was during one of the major waves of legal advice trolls
So what's one good conservative position?
None of that can be explained by allowing private companies to collect digital data.
What you've posted is a great example of scaremongering.
Again, if you want to advocate for privacy, you need to make a direct and explicit connection. Not this tinfoil hat, arm waving general conspiracy thinking. It's not compelling