Exactly. That's why I've been telling people when and where they can show up at in-person fundraisers
"Just print it" at that scale means rapid inflation, which in the US, means you won't hold power for long enough to follow through.
I'll note that moving into the boreal forest is also a high-risk decision; those are all burning, burning more intensely, and burning more often.
It's a bit more than that; there are policies in place which make Chinese emissions likely to slowly drop from here on out
Realistically, you couple domestic regulation with a carbon tariff, assessing incoming goods a fee based on differential pollution in their country of origin.
No, it doesn't matter that the animals were bred for the purpose of inhumane testing.
More that we ought to treat the animals humanely in the process, and limit animal testing to situations where it's a medication that really benefits people, and not a cosmetic.
It's hard to see how an action which results in burned monkey testicles is consistent with that.
We're at the point where we've stepped into a minefield, where each step forward risks losing major ecosystems. We need to take immediate steps to stop walking further into it.
The answer varies a lot between countries. In ones where elections determine who holds power, they're a viable path to achieving change.
Sadly, this one involves burning the testicles of actual living monkeys, and not merely engaging in private pleasures
Emissions have been falling in the US and EU since ~2005 or so, and look to be about to start falling in China, which means that they'll be falling worldwide after this year.
But...they'll likely be falling slowly, rather than rapidly, which is a problem.
It's a gift link. If you've got javascript turned on, and aren't running a browser extension which strips the token out of the URL, you should have access to the full article for the next 12 days or so.