So you're mostly interested in trolling and blaming Democrats as a group rather than electing enough willing Democrats to actually change things.
It's worth noting that the quotes above are not from the article.
I recommend reading the article.
Plenty of people bought them before Musk went full fascist.
You're lumping the whole group together, which isn't a good way to describe what happened when 50 Republicans wanted to block and somewhere around 3-5 Democrats out of 50 wanted to.
I'm not "making execuses" for it — I'm pointing out the reality that the votes to end it haven't been there, and how that happened.
In the US, they're mostly fed to animals, though a chunk get turned into diesel
Given that every Republican was against codification, it only takes having a few Democrats against it to block such a move. Even as a majority of Democrats were in favor, at no time was a majority of the Senate
Cooked doesn't have to mean meat.
Yep. Basically the approach of last resort due to their high cost.
The problem with news is that by convention, every future event without absolute certainty is a "might" or "maybe." Which works great for future human actions, but not when trying to communicate the urgency of getting off of fossil fuels — these things will happen if we don't, even if the timing and suddenness is uncertain.
People said that repeatedly about climate. Then we passed the Inflation Reduction Act.