I don't think that's tractable.
183
If Trump wins the election, US parks and wildlife will face a new age of mining
(www.theguardian.com)
51
Many plastics in Bay Area blue bins end up in landfills. Here’s what is actually recycled
(www.sfchronicle.com)
43
America’s Hurricane Luck Is Running Out | Helene is a harbinger of relentless storm seasons to come.
(www.theatlantic.com)
People with dark skin voted.
Technical solutions aren't crazy; we've pulled them off before for other problems. (Eg: sewage)
It's a question of whether the specific tradeoffs associated with a particular technical approach to a particular problem are worthwhile.
Not too surprising; we've been using selective breeding to radically alter everything we eat since the development of agriculture.
It's not affected by climate change, but it's a risk which wasn't known when a lot of the area was built up. There's a very real potential of people realizing the risk and making decisions to reduce their exposure.
It's a gift link. You should be able to access the article unless:
- You disabled javascript
- You ran a browser extension which strips off the gift link token from the URL
- Your device desperately needs a reboot
The study makes it clear that they did things like compare with people who engage in meat-type-specific restrictions to rule out what you describe.
You can get both at most drug stores
They do sometimes publish, say, environmentalist-oriented articles.
They don't ever publish stuff calling for a redistribution of power from capital to labor.
That area has its own hazard, in the form of earthquake risk.
Yeah, refining some oil deposits involves absolutely huge inputs of methane to turn heavy oil into something that's suitable for use in motor vehicles.