silence7

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

This has been one of the inherent problems with any kind of carbon removal — there's no real way to profit from it, so it was unlikely to happen at scale bigger than a PR operation unless government either pays for it or requires firms to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Yep. Going to need to end that too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, we've wanted too long for zero impact.

We haven't waited too long to still end up with a habitable planet. Failing to act now puts that at risk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hardly; it's largely a matter of how quickly we phase out fossil fuels. Wait longer, and you get to scrap equipment before the ends of its normal useful life instead of getting full use out of what you pay for.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The sooner we act, the less drastic the measures needed are. That's the reality of it, and something I'll keep on pushing for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be better to impose a ban on new gas stoves, but the gas companies reliably fund campaigns for state legislature, so we didn't have the votes to get something like that as far as the governor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

The fossil fuels industry funds a big chunk of their patronage machine. So no surprises.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My solution to that is to maintain a camping stove and a connector to a 20lb propane tank. You can cook for a couple weeks with that if need be, but don't have to breathe the fumes on a routine basis.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

To be fair, they're actually recycling #1 and #2 rigid containers. It's everything else that's not making it.

The better move is to avoid manufacturing other plastics for most consumer products.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not saying that either. But we are at the point where it takes people showing neighbors the changes that everybody needs to make.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They're mostly not blasting it directly; they're selling fossil fuels for others to blast. Changing how you commute or heat your home helps change social norms around those and lowers the rate of emissions

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

No; it's a fairly distant thing with there being some aircraft design happening.

It's not a "next tuesday thing"

Ammonia, steel, and some petrochemicals could be moved much sooner.

view more: ‹ prev next ›