pankuleczkapl

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

As long as you don't use them, sure. They are composed of basic parts, just well adjusted to the purpose. But if you do decide do use them, be aware that you cannot interfere with any radio communications in any way and/or destroy someone's property. Which does not mean I am against shooting down someone's drone on your property that is spying you, it's just not really legal per se.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Regret or self-hate can just as well turn into driving factors to continue doing harm to others. When you are mentally ill, logic starts completely bending and finally making a 180 degrees turn from normal

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Niche? Are you a lunatic? The 3D printing industry is one of the fastest growing fields in the world. 3D printing is getting cheaper and cheaper compared to eg. CNC machining. The industry is a very important one, because it allows you to create accurate parts much more quickly that to drill a block of metal. And all this not even mentioning that this required mostly general computer science skill, I hope you won't call the computer science field niche?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But why would you? You should be able to use any sources you want to learn whenever you want, just be prepared for the exam. I wrote hundreds useless homeworks like this in middle school and I remember nothing from most of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It states "I don't want to waste my time writing some shitty assignments for subjects I will not pursue in the future anyways". This person obviously does have time to acquire knowledge and does it, because programming this requires knowledge about things such as vector graphics, neural networks and GCODE creation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basically the best traits to have in the nearest future where AI will be the most important tool to use anywhere

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Homework requiring writing some shit down from Wikipedia is useless homework anyways - and here this seems to be the case.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The chat GPT interface is literally the simplest part of the whole solution. It requires wiring custom GCODE compiler from vector text and of course converting text to vector graphics. I bet this guy easily could learn anything he wanted to use and is one of the creative guys this society actually runs on in the long term.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Nobody claims it's fine, it's just a personal example

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You almost arrived at the correct answer. The problem is that would happen. More specifically we know that four fundamental interactions can pass through the portals, e.g. a thing that is whole before passing through portals is still whole after passing through them, though for any pair of particles, atoms, neutrons and protons etc. there was a moment in time where they were separated by the portal. If you imagine the portal moving towards the pole at some speed and in the middle of it suddenly stopping, the momentum of the part on the other side would slightly pull on it, and the pole would still be moving at a reduced speed. The momentum of the second part cannot disappear and will pull on the first part. The only other reasonable option is that the pole gets split, but that obviously is not the case. So B it is

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally have the exact model and everything works perfectly, the safe wattage margin is bound to come useful in the future to power these GPU monsters and the modular detachable cables are super useful for cable management. I suggest you first connect the cables and then put the PSU into the case, contrary to what my friend suggested, it will save you a lot of trouble. Good luck!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I think this discussion is leading nowhere, but I again want to emphasize the fact that you cannot point to a person and say that their actions specifically led to any harm and thus you cannot (imo of course) morally hold them responsible. As for the second part that was not my point, you are of course right about what you said and I agree with the whole paragraph, I just wanted to show an extreme example of how there is no harm, because there is no way such a person would pay for the content anyways - so yeah, you can just let them not enjoy filet mignon, but why would you when they could eat it with no harm to anyone? And as for the last part I am not stating that piracy is always a clearly good thing, I am just stating that it is ethically neutral in most cases and rarely necessary to save content from being forgotten or for other research purposes, when eg. the scientific articles are locked behind absurd paywalls.

view more: ‹ prev next ›