nitrolife

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I see this channel time by time. Mini apartments in tokio. it looks like an advertising channel, but it's actually interesting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Russian, English and some Japanese.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Insert logs in pastebin.com and attach links and you can open ticket on git.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

You can use postfix + dovecot + roundcube + spamassassin + opendkim + pigeonhole. Maximum stability. Roundcube have aliases plugin.

You can start from here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Virtual_user_mail_system_with_Postfix,_Dovecot_and_Roundcube

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Topic starter don't use docker containers. He use lxc containers. LXC is virtual machines on host kernel. Case is that: He have 3 virtual machines with shared disk. In 3 VMs have 3 different applications. Applications work under different users and can't rewrite data on shared disk. That is user permissions problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

the idea is that: all your applications work under the same user. or at least under the same group. because this is exactly how the differentiation of rights is applied.

A good plan is to create some kind of user in all three containers and run qbittorrent, samba and the third application under it.

A bad plan is to run everything under a random user with 777 rights, but this is a really bad plan.

Create a user in all three containers and work under it. That is not hard. Run qbittorent with that user. Config will be there: /home/user/.config . Then set that user for samba. I don't know third app , but I think you can find how change user in manual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can use Revolt. Literaly Discord clone. https://github.com/revoltchat

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Her argument for being vocal is that her and her generation will have to live with the consequences of our fuckups the longest and hardest.

Surprise, but if you stop generate energy by oil you can't have hard industry. It is quite difficult to cast steel without huge energy consumption. And aluminum is even more difficult. But for some reason, no one wants to ride horses and abandon airplanes. Them can stop buy industrial products. And problem will gone.

And no, strangling heavy industry in your country until it is evacuated to China is not a fight for the global environment.

It is convenient, of course, to tell what idiots everyone around is without having worked a single day in heavy industry. And in Greta's case, without having worked a day at all, apparently. I suggest she work at the factory for a couple of years and then repeat her statements.

And it is better to live for a couple of years in a country with a less mild climate. Let's say where it is -30 in winter. Surely she doesn't hope that all 9 billion people will fit into the warm bosom of the Gulf Stream? Pollution from heating is also very significant. We don't even turn off cars here in some cities because then we just won't start them.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

or you can't buy if you're not successful enough or you're in the wrong country. For example, in my country, the minimum cost of a 1TB SSD is about $85 and a salary of $2,000 is considered a very successful salary at the upper limit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You really won't see this in the USA, because few people even reach the border. After September 11, the United States is fine with eliminating threats. For example, the United States knew about this attack for 2 weeks.

UPD: I also remind you that after September 11, the United States did not limit itself to one person but beat up an entire country

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

At the beginning of the article, it is mentioned that only the use of uranium-238, which is now not used, will expand the reserves of nuclear fuel by about 200 times.

UPD: also in another article I read that not all uranium is completely destroyed in the reactor cycle, the rest turns into radioactive waste, which in a few years can be cooled and recycled into new rods for the reactor. in France, for example, they have been doing this for a long time. Here: https://habr.com/ru/articles/588877/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Oh, if only the reactors worked exclusively on uranium. Of course, I can quote Rosatom's articles, but unfortunately they are only in Russian. A closed fuel cycle was developed there back in 2015. If you want you can use Google translate: https://habr.com/ru/articles/388533/

P.S. It is very specific to get scientific knowledge from a book called GREEN POLITICAL THOUGHT

view more: next ›