They frequently report on conspiracies and political myths, too
naught
Curious why this bot gathers downvotes - can anyone say?
I have repeatedly heard her voting record is relatively close in line with Bernie's, who is as about as left as they come here in the US. I haven't verified that, but if it is true, how can you call her a centrist? Do you have information I lack?
You may point to her being a "cop," which is a fair enough critique, but centrist is not really what I expected to hear
Trump told you exactly who he was, though. He bullied and bullied and people cheered for it. He constantly proved he was racist and xenophobic and stoked fear through lies like a fascist. I mean remember "Grab her by the pussy"? He was publicly and proudly vile.
Hillary had some dud memes and a ridiculously trumped up email scandal. I'm not saying she's a saint, cuz she ain't, but it was pretty clear who the "better" person was and is.
just not abjectly horrible
uhmmmm without even delving into his politics, he's literally a pedophile & rapist. That's in the "abjectly horrible" category for me. May be easy to forget all the awful things he's done because they are so numerous.
Anyway I otherwise agree
There was a Twitter post claiming he wrote in his book that he fucked couch cushions as a younger lad. It is (as far as we know) not true, however it caught like wildfire and is now a certified dank meme
This is such a weird non sequitur -- what?
Maybe that's reasonable. Where do we draw the line? What's the statute of limitations on an atrocity? What is terrible enough to warrant a ban? What about having capital punishment? Depending on where you draw the line, I feel like a lot of the world would be stripped of their colors at the Olympics, which to me feels like it defeats the purpose.
ty for your take
edit: added example
That's fair I think
You are already (fat and fluffy) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯