To add another buzzword or rather proverb: pick your battles!
mod
joined 2 years ago
Just a quick heads up that circular arguments won't get you far in good faith arguments. I'm starting to doubt that this was your intention at all.
What do you want to express with that?
Why do you see this as an "objective failure"? If you say that the vaccine is required to stop the spread, wouldn't that mean that most people are required to be vaccinated in order to measure this effect?
How do you compare vaccinations against chicken pox and COVID? What do you take into account?
Neither did I say that you said that. I was asking who should be on the birth certificate and who shouldn't, since you were tersely implying that the married woman who wasn't carrying the baby shouldn't be on the birth certificate, because she is not her biological parent.
So what are your thoughts? Who should be on the birth certificate and why?
that mRNA thing that objectively did not work?
How do you arrive at this conclusion? What do you mean by objectively?
So you think it would be best if the biological father who donated his sperm is on the birth certificate?
This is actually a monkey's paw. Seems like you still have four wishes left.
This seems to be non-compliant to the GDPR:
Under Article 17 of the UK GDPR individuals have the right to have personal data erased. This is also known as the ‘right to be forgotten’.
You should be able to control your information because it's yours afterall.
Why? Played it years ago but don't remember tears.