This client looks interesting but community groups seem to be very WIP at the moment. Posts in those groups are sorted by community (some arbitrary amount is pulled), then requested order (new, hot etc) and it takes ages to load so it's probably not very threaded. Regardless, this looks promising and I'll keep my eye on it - thanks!
misk
Look into OpenCore Legacy Patcher. I updated my GFs 2012 Air to Ventura and it's running okay. A bit clunky around MacOS updates since you have to specifically run patcher again to get graphics acceleration again but otherwise fine. It's definitely worth it for security updates.
We wczorajszej serii tweetów i dzisiejszej kontynuacji widać niekontrolowane miotanie się i zarzucanie wszystkim wszystkiego, z wątpliwym zakotwiczeniem w rzeczywistości.
Za słownikiem Cambridge, nieformalne znaczenie słowa meltdown:
an occasion when a person becomes extremely upset and is not able to deal with a problem or situation
Można to inaczej ubrać w słowa, np.
Doprawdy korespondencje Giertycha ze słonecznej Italii nie wyglądają poważnie i nie świadczą dobrze o kondycji emocjonalnej gwiazdy palestry. - jak ujęto zwięźle w felietonie w Polityce.
Ale meltdown zwięźlej.
Giertych zaliczył chyba kompletny meltdown.
Zaczął wychwalać Lidię Staroń, z którą jako niezależną kandydatką (ale efektywnie współpracująca z PiS) miał konkurować w Olsztynie. Staroń jest między innymi fanką obecnego stanu prawnego w temacie aborcji, a Stowarzyszenie Obrony Spółdzielców, z którego się oryginalnie wybiła po latach wygląda na równie umoczone jak układ, z którym walczyło.
Zarzuty i symetryzm do środowiska Trzaskowskiego to tak bardzo "???", że nawet nie wiadomo do czego pije i jak skomentować.
Giertych zaczyna też mieć problem z rozróżnieniem swoich fantazji i rzeczywistości twierdząc, że Lewica będzie miała problem z przekroczeniem progu 5%. Nie widzi problemu z PSL / P2050 i ich startem jako koalicja.
Rozbawiło mnie też:
Tak przestrzegałem w roku 2007, gdy ułatwiłem zwycięstwo opozycji. I niestety PiS wrócił.
Bóg Imperator Diudy
Żałosny poziom clickbaitu
TikTok is absolutely scummy in how they nag you for access rights to phone features / data but I don't think there's a way to do this without adding third "Popular" tab next to Following and For You.
If they had this as a setting then it'd have to stay this way. Industry standard is to withhold such setting and constantly default to algorithmic page in the attempt to trap you there or make you tired of switching feed constantly.
I prefaced this with disclaimer that's a personal experience. It's probably hard to measure because people aren't that eager to self report tax avoidance.
It is government's interest though. Hence extensive AML regulations for example.
Yeah, their algo is fun most of the time but it's easy to fall into a bubble and detach from reality. It's also quite transparent how often you're subjected to annoying A/B testing. I'm glad this is happening because it gives users ability to see general view and get more control over their experience.
Building complex systems involving humans is hard because humans are flawed. The best thing we've come up so far are systems involving extensive checks and balances to prevent thing happening too rapidly and without necessary oversight and even then it's a tricky part to balance.
For the record, I'm not for entirely cashless society but organisations that are cash heavy have proven to be source of many headaches. There is a balance to be found on thresholds and barring some types of businesses from using cash and where digital money transfer is required. Banks and other money transfer entities will have to deal with scenarios where malicious parties will try to obfuscate their intent outside of those thresholds.
This is all technically true but cash is not the answer.
Right now there are so many easily accessible ways for governments to spy on people (cell phone geolocation, call metadata monitoring) that I'm not sure that for the purposes you think of you aren't screwed already anyway. From this perspective fight for cash use becomes a bit theoretical.
The only people that I know of personally that are strongly for cash are either people that frequently skirt around taxes ("minor" stuff like car repair shops) and unfortunately conspiracy nuts. Genuine privacy oriented people exist but realistically the majority will be there for selfish reasons.
The societal cost of tax evasion, money laundering and financing organisations that legally require transparency (political orgs, NGOs etc) are massive and immediate.
What we really need is strong oversight of institutions, government transparency, rule of law and healthy democracy. Those are the things you want to enshrine in your constitution.
Religion is not the goal of conservatives, it's a tool to preserve hierarchy in the society. Capitalism is another tool that achieves that.
The people that aren't wealthy but are conservative benefit from hierarchy enforced by religion. It ensures that they're not on the bottom of society - that place is intended for various minorities.