If we don't avoid the climate change catastrophe, then current investments are going to be even less valuable than if we do. That's no argument for continuing to prop up those industries.
I have a feeling that the fossil-fuel investors, to the extent that they trouble their pretty heads about it at all, think that, so long as they make enough money now, they can just run really good air conditioning and it won't affect them. Idiots.
Countries that fail to invest in new technologies like solar and batteries will be left behind economically. Their investment in fossil fuels is going to be worth less and less, and they will have nothing to replace it with.
But, we are going to prop up large vested fossil fuel interests as long as possible, of course.
The wren gets to have his/her tail in the picture, but the long-tailed tit doesn't. That seems unfair.
Plus the wren gets a day named after it. There's clear evidence of bias here.
As Van Gogh wrote to Gauguin: I have hung the guest bedroom here in Arles with a series of frames that you simply have to come and see.
Of course, those frames aren't the ones on display. They're too valuable.
No, indeed. I myself am one of the many millions of people that visit the National Gallery each year to look at the frames.
The same judge (Southwark) thinks that damage to the eye socket of an off-duty police officer should get a suspended sentence.
But sure, when it's a picture frame, you have to send a message.
Sure. I was just trying to make a slightly pedantic joke to mechoman444.
Exactly. Lack of belief in gods is not the same as actively denying that there are gods.
Surely atheism is the belief in the lack of a god. Agnosticism is the lack of belief in a god.
That's terrible! We should organize a protest.
The 5 bullet points do not sound like slang terms to me.
If we can spot these trends while working 9-5, then an idiot can probably spot them if they spend 40 hours a week on it.