meathorse

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Short Circuit 2 - Holding on for a hero.

Much more impactful than how it was used in Shrek 2.

Real stakes, life and death. Spoiler warning - clip spoils the climax of the movie...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfjv66w9u7c

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

National: strip-mines the public sector...

"Oh no, see - this doesn't work, the public sector can't do anything right. Obviously the solution is to privatise everything"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That is literally what the first Xbox was. It's internals was a custom mboard running a Celeron 700 and 3.5" HDD (can't remember what the graphics was based on, maybe a GeForce MX?) with a customised Win2k OS.

All approx. It's early and I can't be bothered confirming those specs are 100% accurate :p

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And 1893 in New Zealand - Southern Hemisphere Power Couple baby!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Quite a few things - mostly used it for capturing images, loading drivers and updates into images but can also be used to pull apps out of the image too.

For a live windows install there are PowerShell commands to do this

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/manufacture/desktop/add-or-remove-packages-offline-using-dism?view=windows-11

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

A woman's role in theatre played by an actual woman!? What a load of woke agenda BS!

/S

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure about this one - it's definately not my experience but yours could be very different.

The system definitely reports data back to MS but I've never seen a box have issues because we denied it the ability to dial home or update. Unless the PC is online and the user is actively trying to prevent the updates installing? I've seen users pull the plug on a PC that started/midway though updates hoping to stop them and it would often make a mess of things.

We had a small handful of XP then Win7 boxes that were completely off the grid/standalone as SCADA access points/controllers? for several years without issues.

Likewise, we had one box where the vendor did not allow any updates despite it being networked and online. They had disabled win updates completely without our input. It ran just fine for a few years until it was picked up in a security audit. We didn't understand why updates were disabled at that time so we switched them back on and updated. The PC ran just fine until it's eventual retirement.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's right! I remember those signed drivers where also why early XP (pre SP2) had a bad rep. Not as bad as ME but users were swearing on the graves of dead relatives they would never give up W98 or W2k. Without new or signed drivers, a lot of hardware struggled but by the time SP2 rolled out, hardware vendors had mostly caught up and the OS had matured.

Vista had similar issues (so, so many issues with Vista) with it's security changes which made life difficult for badly written/insecure software (wanting admin rights to run or write access to system folders/reg keys). Those changes in Vista paved the way for Win7 to be so much better at launch since most software had caught up by then.

I think the issue with disabling components is 90% how users remove them. Pulling them out via "official" methods hasn't ever caused me issues - DISM is really handy - particularly for permanently removing the default apps. Those deeply connected functions can be a pain!

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (10 children)

My dumb arse used to do this to win 98/me when I was a student. "Optimising" everything and deleting anything I would never use, trying to squeeze every mb out of my limited 2gb disk space but the damn thing was so unreliable I was constantly reinstalling windows.

After one reload, I finished late at night and just left it alone, forgetting to perform all my "power user customisation" until I remembered a week later when it suddenly dawned on me that it was running fast AND stable - I hadn't had a single crash that week. As a final test, I applied all my "optimisations" again and "oh, look! It's crashing constantly again". I was a slow learner and turns out I don't know better than the people that built the system!

I always think of this when I see threads about win7 - 11 being unstable, because it just isn't. As you dig through the thread, the op reveals more - they've chopped out all sorts of system components with registry hacks and third party tools or blocked updates and then bitch about windows being garbage - don't get me wrong, they simultaneously make it better and worse with every release so I sympathize why people try chopping out edge, copilot etc - but just don't.

Disabling services and uninstalling functions the non-hacky way 'should' be fine (and likely reversable) but if someone wants to bare-bone their OS or be data gathering-free, they'd be better off learning Linux.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

And Palmy will become a tropical seaside city!

Truely a distopian future lies before us...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Bottle opener

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Capped - gotta keep the connection usable and in my eyes availability > speed.

Very few things I need "right now" so I can be patient as not being able to find something can be much more frustrating.

Saying that, if you need to switch off, do so. If they really want it, they'll leave it queued and it's not on you to act as the entire distribution source (unless it's your distro!)

view more: ‹ prev next ›