oh boi, do I have some news for you..
Subscribed
Ooh, I'm sorry Mr ~~Alien~~Human, it seems I did a whoosh. I think your friend also sent me the picture, might wanna check with them. Too be fair, your face is very memeable.
That's right, thanks :) It even runs smoother than on my (also 10 year old) Macbook Pro with a dedicated graphics card. I guess the drivers for the intel 5000 are better
Thanks, that helped a little. The frontend and the proxy show no errors, the backend shows a parsing exception and a timeout exception. However, I got invidious to run without problems in the meantime, so I'm staying with that
I think they’re perfectly safe, but I don’t think we have a good way of storing the waste. Just leave some highly reactive stuff underground for a few hundred to thousand years? That sounds like a recipe for disaster at some point, that is a freakin long time
I created some plots from the data I collected for my research on correlating CVEs to Clean Code requirements.
Disclaimer: My n=19 is really low. The data is very probably not significant. It's part of a seminar, it just doesn't have the scope for a bigger data collection. I hope to do that for my masters thesis.
The first plot isn't really that surprising and just "confirms" the intuition, that more contributors catch more bugs.
The second is quite interesting. I may have a bias in there and just picked a lot of inactive projects for the projects without requirements (although projects like npm are in there), but it's still quite surprising for me that there is that big of a difference.
Don't be salty because we've got a working democracy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ sure, it isn't perfect, but it's not all about the money here. Being a politician on that level already pays quite nicely without being bought by a company or two. And voters have a lot of power over who gets into the EU parliament, so a lot of them really do represent the common folks.
Fortunately we have some and are getting more options with the framework laptops, and there are some other hardware manufacturers who have Linux compatibility as a priority
They are doing it to help consumers and protect the environment by forcing modularity and recyclable components.
I would agree a few years ago, but saying that it's generally not usable for users is (in my opinion) wrong. If you're only going to use a browser, and watch some videos, Linux is fine. If you're a gamer and only use Steam, Linux is fine. Linux was also fine for me when installing Lutris to run other Windows games like Trackmania. For both those cases, I didn't even have to touch the command line. If you're a programmer, Linux is probably fine, because you have more knowledge on how command lines work anyways.
If you have any kind of advanced use case that doesn't have a well established solution, and you have to research (sometimes a little, sometimes a lot), that's probably not fine for a normal user. But more and more tools do have established solutions that work out of the box, so I'd say it's getting more fine.
Whether Windows, Mac or Linux is better is a question of use case and other factors in my opinion. You only used Windows your whole life and don't want to get used to a new thing? Then don't. You love the Apple ecosystem and want to pay the premium? Do so. But I feel like outright saying Linux isn't for regular use has become false in the recent years, as there are quite a few use cases by now that can use Linux without problems.