lewosadebu

Hazard potential refers to the inherent capacity of a substance, activity, or process to cause harm under certain circumstances. It doesn't take into account the likelihood or circumstances of exposure, which is where risk comes in.

Think of it this way: a hazardous substance is one that could cause harm. For instance, a poisonous chemical has the inherent potential to cause harm, thus it is a hazard. However, the risk associated with this hazardous substance is dependent on factors like how, how much, how long, and how often a person is exposed to it.

In the context of the aspartame debate, the hazard potential refers to the possibility that aspartame could potentially cause harm (like cancer) under certain circumstances. However, this doesn't necessarily translate to a significant risk for humans consuming aspartame in normal dietary amounts because the exposure is much lower than the levels where harm was observed. The actual risk to humans is determined by the likelihood of that harm occurring at the levels of aspartame consumption typical in human diets.

Or at least that's how I understood it from the article 😅

my bad 🙃

Absolutely, does it fit 🙂

but as far as I can tell most posts were complaining about Meta, no?

feel free to share some of these lovely creatures on here 😉

To be completely honest, I check the top posts over at reddit and copy the ones I like here 🙃 This way others don't have to give reddit any traffic 😉

The problem is they wouldn't believe it anyway...

fits perfectly 😂

Awesome! I love it.

Jup... The obsession these guys have. Fucking creepy!

fully agree

True! Let me change the title 😉