What do you use instead of Mullvad now?
lemmeBe
~~Again~~ Another elitist Linuxer. 🙄
The guy has over 100 million subscribers on YT, and has been hugely popular for 15 years.
Endorsement from such figures could get us closer to the mythical year of Linux. Why shun it...
Try JetBrains Mono.
Come as you are.
Had similar experience with snapshots. Restore to the last working version just to find the same issue that's been bothering me.
Then went back to the classic approach with 👻 images and Rescuezilla.
With NVME drive, it takes 7min to backup 60Gb, and 3min to restore it.
Yeah, they'll do that... 😆
Maybe we will, maybe we won't, but at least it's tech news for a change. 😄
They're actually podcasts that have RSS feeds for following new episodes. I don't know if podcasts are your thing. They weren't mine either, but now I put them on when I go to bed and listen to banter about Linux and FOSS. 😄
It's an issue according to any UX pattern. If something says that it's done when it's not, it's misrepresenting the state of the action.
Hard to believe that modifying the counter to include the necessary time for actual writing to the flash drive would break everything. Target flash drives only etc.
System functioning as intended doesn't mean that it's a good UX.
Thanks! I'll try that out today!
Why quotation marks? Issue is an issue, decades or days old. 😄
Copying mechanism itself isn't an issue here; false reporting that something is done when it's not is.
Feeder