kalistia

joined 1 year ago
[–] kalistia 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not really, it's more the red costume that was! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father_Christmas

[–] kalistia 2 points 2 weeks ago

I have a stupid question but what are the costs of a journal like this? I mean, if they don't pay the researchers and the reviewers, what do they do?

[–] kalistia 1 points 3 weeks ago

On est repartis ! 😁

[–] kalistia 3 points 1 month ago

Somebody wants a word with you

[–] kalistia 10 points 1 month ago

Perhaps it's because our society values certain professions much more than others, particularly those in the social/educational sector, which are particularly undervalued. IMO, we need to put everything on the table and reconsider what we want to be considered as useful work for society.

[–] kalistia 7 points 1 month ago

I agree with you that it would be foolish to believe that any company would support a cheap device perpetually but I think it should be common practice (or mandatory) to open the software so that people can extend the life of these devices. Generally speaking, as a species we cannot afford to waste electronic devices simply because the software is not up to date.

[–] kalistia 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well, the article says: "Google says it will continue to push software and security updates to its newer devices without specifying which ones.".

So only newer devices (and we don't know which ones), and if you are a bit familiar with technology, you would very well know that they will just quit updating the software anyways after some time as they stopped making the whole Chromecast line.

That's still a lot of devices that would be perfectly usable and will eventually go to waste. So imo my remark about the fact that we should have laws forcing manufacturers to make their software open source as soon as they're no longer updated is still valid!

[–] kalistia 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

And? Do they plan to put all the software open source so that the millions of hardware they sold would not go to waste in some years? We should force them to by law.

[–] kalistia 15 points 1 month ago
[–] kalistia 8 points 2 months ago

Nope, France is unfortunately not breaking the circle, because the left did not win the election, they just have more MPs than the others, but not at all a strict majority. Now, Uninspiring "center" and right (and why not some far right) are trying to form an alliance to form a government...

[–] kalistia 23 points 3 months ago

It's been 7 years that Macron and his minions did all they could to divide french society in order to stay in power. They criminalized the mostly peaceful ecological and social protests, they (over)used all the least democratic powers (49.3 and others) they had to push through socially unjust reforms, they have cynically and with the sole aim of winning votes, lumped together the parties of the left and the far right, and have deliberately blurred the political field. They refused to stand in the way of the far right in the last parliamentary elections, allowing a few hundred of them to become MPs and giving them prestigious positions in the parliament, simply out of political expediency. They have constantly pushed far-right themes such as security and immigration into the public debate, again simply to try and divide people and win votes. For these european elections, they snubbed all other parties other than the extreme right and even gave them more credibility (and publicity) by sending the Prime Minister to debate with their representative (and with no one from any other party). Macron, who said a few years ago that he would do everything to ensure that people no longer had any reason to vote for the far right, has been playing with fire in an attempt to divide the country and keep power. He is guilty of the current situation, and the dissolution of the assembly is not a clever or courageous move, but rather a cynical act of impotence by a lonely man who now wants to play the "it's me or chaos" game. To think that if the far right wins these next elections and a PM from their ranks is appointed, this would be an opportunity to prove how incompetent they are and destroy them, is to becompletelyy delusional. It's forgetting that this would put France in a catastrophic situation for years to come, with social and ecological ruin, and above all that its main effect would be to open the Overton window even wider, making it even more likely that the far right would soon gain to the real power with no real counterweight, the Presidency.

[–] kalistia 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Mais même avec ça il est à 30%+... Allez y comprendre quelque chose...

130
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by kalistia to c/[email protected]
 

Shamelessly stolen somewhere else 😅

 

This is quite concerning

 

Les retours en arrière c'est toujours une mauvaise nouvelle, mais là le timing questionne...

 

The latest I've found is this one !

Context: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/128387/2/128387.pdf

 

Cette année encore nos élu·es se montrent très imaginatifs : squatteurs, piégeurs, cancres en maths, inventifs. En 2023 le registre de leurs pratiques abusives continue de s'élargir.

Votez pour élire vos pires candidat·es 2023 et tentez de gagner un exemplaire des Enquêtes de Mediapart en bande dessinée 2024, en coédition avec La Revue Dessinée (dix exemplaires sont en jeu). Dix affiches des Awards 2023 sont également à gagner.

Vous avez jusqu’au 10 janvier pour jouer. Le palmarès sera communiqué dans notre newsletter Enquête du 13 janvier.

view more: next ›