jrherita

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Not really - they’ll throttle if they run too hot. No need to artificially power limit. They’re engineered that way.

There are also plenty of air coolers than can handle 200-250W

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'd lean i7-14700K.

Marginally more efficient, a little less total power draw in games (~ 131W vs 143W) and apps (155W vs 169W): https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i7-14700k/22.html

and you get the APO features.

Either one will be fine though. 13900K is a little faster in applications overall, but 14700K is a little easier to cool and cheaper to boot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Geekbench is a pretty poor benchmark..

There are also differences between Windows OS and macOS so it’s not a fair comparison for snappiness as they’ll feel different even on exactly the same hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

What are cinebench and passmark scores with this config?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Variable: Pat Gelsinger referrer to Arrow Lake as a small die. Certainly some of that is due to the tile architecture but Intel could also have shortened the pipeline which would reduce clocks outside of the process/ transistor changes (while also improving latency).

Good analysis though. We probably won't see higher clocks until later versions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

10700K to 15th gen or 7800X3D (for gaming) will both be good upgrades.

I tend to upgrade when I “need”. 2600K —> 8700K because VR performance was getting weak and Battlefield V couldn’t maintain 60 fps on the OC 2600K. 8700K —> 9900K because Microcenter had a $249 sale on 9900K, figured why not. 9900K —> Ryzen 7 7700X because I wanted new platform features, and I was getting back into flight simulation in VR, and I knew that the 7800X3D would plug in and work great (and it did). The 7700X was a large upgrade from the 9900K in some other games though too — Apex Legends, for example.

Before the 2600K I always had a rule of ‘can I get 3x the performance out of the new chip? If yes, then upgrade’. That was easy in earlier days - but now 3X performance takes a really long time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Glass half full - I think phoenix is using RDNA 3.5. So behind on CPU. Ahead on GPU ;)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you're on ddr4 and gaming is important 13600K. See techspot review on 13600k. It's faster with ddr4 than 12900K with ddr5 in gaming.