Would this work: https://github.com/johannesschiessl/Goodnotes-Backup
irmadlad
entirety of my network to a third party tool that I don’t know that well.
Understandable.
But I’m not very comfortable giving 100% access to Tailscale to my internal network
Out of curiosity, why are you uncomfortable with Tailscale?
Interesting. What kind of limits are there? For instance, I probably have archived well over 50k links/articles. Are there import/export options? Being federated and designed to be a share/colab platform, are there options where certain links remain private? I mean, most people probably don't want to see all my tentacle porn. /s I'm down to to help in beta testing if that is needed. Currently I run Readeck & Linkwarden, but those are not share/colab apps. What are you using for tagging....AI or is it up to the instance owner to properly tag?
What kind of security measures are you running with a public facing website?
I think for now, I will just be a part of what is already here. Maybe later I may entertain the idea.
I can definitely sing the praises of Proxmox. One of the three businesses I run from home uses a piece of software called BlueBeam. Feature for feature, I've not been able to find an opensource alternative. So I spin up a Windows VM with Proxmox for BlueBeam. I also run quite a few of the helper scripts, tho I am really keeping an eye on that. There seems to be diverging opinions among the devs on how things should operate. I also run a couple of small AI projects on Proxmox, so yea....it gets a work out. For what Proxmox can do, I was honestly surprised that the community edition was free. That's an awesome piece of software.
~~Do you have persistent IPtables then?~~
counters that periodically reset,
Yes, reading comprehension on my part. Doh!
homepage
I liked Homepage. Very customizable, very well presented package and the UI is nice. I know, if you are running the *arr stack, it does a lot of interfacing with those apps. Not exclusively the *arr stack as it can interface with ProxMox to show how many VMs you're running and load/CPU etc.
Samba was not designed to be containerized.
There are some things that shouldn't be containerized even tho they can be. I can see the benefit of a user wanting to containerize everything....it's one neat little package. I look at on a case by case basis. For instance, Caddy I installed on bare metal instead of a container even tho there is one for Caddy.
To be honest, that was the only thing I could scrape up. At the very least, I figured if it wasn't readily usable, it would give you some ideas of how to cobble together something along the same lines to solve your issue. Other options were using proprietary apps like FoneBackup, etc.
Cheers