ineffable

joined 1 year ago
[–] ineffable 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have to sign in to Bluesky to see all content, or just videos?

[–] ineffable 2 points 3 weeks ago

Boom headshot

[–] ineffable 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And of course a Simpsons reference

[–] ineffable 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ineffable 1 points 1 month ago

I did not, but I do now!

[–] ineffable 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now do your usernma

[–] ineffable 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ineffable 19 points 1 month ago

Germany's Left Party wants to halve billionaires...

[–] ineffable 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ineffable 2 points 2 months ago

Ow mein arsh

[–] ineffable 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's another clickbait article about roads with no intent but to rile people up

You are correct about uncontrolled intersections, this suggests we could remove the separate pedestrian signals at traffic lights

As shown in the image: "Pedestrians walking the same diection as main road traffic share the same green light"

As you say (and included in the article) there's a stunningly obvious reason we don't do this already: pedestrians are vulnerable, and we can make good estimates about how long the pedestrian red should be to allow safe crossing

Just put 'making intersections less safe' over there on the garbage pile with 'speed has no impact on the likelihood or severity of accidents'

view more: next ›