index

Name any realistic scenario where voting for red or blue would affect positive change

If we look at the chart the emissions are pretty much as high as they were in 1990, they even went up in the past few years. They could drop these in a day by banning billionares commodities. There's a reason why climate activists aren't advocating for the current ruling parties.

You are more MAGA than me, you are defending the US government who's former ceo is trump.

Yes the lesser evil logic is non sense.

All it takes for a party to become relevant is a pop star with million of followers making a post.

The world is at the finish line and there a thousand things you can do to fight the climate cause. Climate activists are blocking roads they are not advocating for the parties who are responsible for the climate crisis.

https://saganic.blogspot.com/2007/06/us-military-bases-in-italy-there-are.html

This is how many military facilities usa has in italy alone. More than 100. As an italian it seem laughable to me to believe that the former ceo of usa is controlled by russia.

The target has not being reached and the government isn't even considering doing something as simple as banning private jets or yachts. If you care about the climate cause do not advocate for the parties and politicians who have brought us to this point. Instead of defending them and pointing out that one is less awful than the other use your energies to do something better.

Scientists have been warning us for years that we are getting past the point of no return. Red and blue party have both led us there and not give a fuck about climate until the pressure was on losing votes because of it. Under the current climate crisis the government isn't even considering banning private jets and yachts to keep pleasing the 0.01%