hessenjunge

2 x No it isn’t. I know you love your precious precious nuclear to death and back and you really really need to discuss coal to better shill for it. Nobody cares about your religion and your straw man.

Finally we reached the stage of you throwing shit on the wall in the hope something sticks.

arxiv.org 1810.02865

Published by team working for Bangladeshi Nuclear energy providers and reads a bit like a promotion piece. It is cited nowhere but I'm sure their employer/customer was happy.

pubs.geoscienceworld.org/..../Natural-fission-reactors-of-Oklo

Please explain the relevance pertaining to this discussion.

www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7804

Way better than your 1st article but still drives on assumed probabilities.

Safe? No, it isn't.

www.science.org/d ... /science.254.5038.1603

This article is by psychologists. Relevance?

Assuming you did some research on this (who am I kidding though) you should have found at per each article you find that claims storage is safe you'll find at least 2 incidents disproving that. If you'll look at the corresponding Wikipedia page you'll find these are mostly in developed countries or where they can be detected by developed countries. Surely this is just coincidence and not the tip of the proverbial iceberg...

I could drown you with links & articles of better scientific provenience but since that would be pointless I'd like to point out another fact to consider that doesn't get discussed enough:

At current (nuclear energy) consumption level the global stockpile of fissionable material is estimated to provide energy for another 230 years. That seems a lot and would buy us and a couple of future generations time. Until you factor in Germany and others stopping all efforts to implement renewables, emerging countries doing the same and also the rising demand for electricity which is estimated to drive up current nuclear energy consumption by 20. Suddenly that lengthy period of 230 years is gone..

Fission and fossile both rely on finite consumables. All energy providers have pollution associated with them. Out of these however only renewable get their energy from the sun which is good for another couple of billion years. So the only option is to go all in on renewables.

Yes, at the very least Germany should have started decades ago but Germans decided they'd like a conservative Government for most of the past 40 years.

It would be of the discussion was nuclear vs coal - which it isn’t.

You’re bringing up the straw man because you want turn away the discussion from renewables.

There’s good discussion to be had on the (complex) situation in Germany but it’s immediately flooded by the nuke-bots.

FYI: There are generally five types of toxicities: chemical, biological, physical, radioactive and behavioural.

Toxicity at least in scientific literature only refers to chemical toxicity. What even would be “physical toxicity”?!

Maybe, just maybe, you should have read the Wikipedia article you linked. Not only did I lift that sentence from there it also explains physical toxicity. Sometimes you should read past the headline.

( Skipping the rest of the BS and jumping to the grand finale.)

Here is a good video why nuclear waste is not the issue people like you make it out to be: https://youtu.be/4aUODXeAM-k

Oh, so you got your PHD from Youtube University^tm^ - I didn't know that! My bad, you win!

JK, I like to get my info from different sources including but not limited to actual professors of physics (e.g. Harald Lesch) and they don't agree with mister Youtube dude.

Nobody brings up coal but nuclear stans and bots. You definitely put your favorite straw man to work.

Thanks for this picture-perfect post of a nuke-stan / nuke-bot

Toxicity I believe is about equal.

I generally try to respect other peoples religion but yours is a threat to the ecosphere. I believe you know your statement is bullshit.

Storage requirements are a bit stricter for nuclear in terms of storage container requirements

People opposed to nuclear know this already but why do you think that is?

Follow up: How long does it need to be safely stored? Please note the number of years.

Humanity is about 300.000 years old, the Pyramids of Gizeh were build about 4600 years ago, the Vandals sacked Rome 1569 years ago, WW2 ended about 80 years ago. Now compare the those times with the time radioactive waste needs to be safely stored (and it definitely isn't at the moment).

Note: radiation is not toxicity.

FYI: There are generally five types of toxicities: chemical, biological, physical, radioactive and behavioural.

To be fair radioactive toxicity stands a bit out because it is (in your wording) much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much more toxic than anything else possibly including 'forever chemicals'.

Nuclear energy is not cheaper nor safer, you're just kicking a toxic, radioactive can down the road.

Amazing. I’m sorry if this was too complicated for you. Let me repeat:

There is no indication whatsoever that drug dealer guy knew. This has been explained to you a couple of times by other people.

In fact the glaring absence of any indication can be interpreted as: no, drug dealer did not know. This has also been explained.

You, on the other hand, claim the revenge taken out by Anon in itself is proof that he knew. Because a cuckold will never attack the lover unless the lover knew what they were doing.

That would be cool if it were so but it just isn’t. The trope of the cuckold attacking the lover is older than humanity itself. You’ll find stories even (or rather especially) in Greek mythology where cuckolding or just fancying the wrong person leads to eternal punishment. Also by the age of 20 most of us witnessed similar behavior a couple of times. If you didn’t good for you / grey out of the basement more.

You are doing the equivalent of arguing that 1+1 does not equal 2.

I’m not taking this personally, don’t project. I’m just amazed how you stubbornly argue against one of the oldest story tropes of all time: the horned, vengeful husband/wife.

Correct, cuckolded men are well known to first ask their wife’s lover if they knew before attacking them. /s

What is the toxicity and half life / storage requirements for each waste type?

Redd.. err Lemmy believes in the doctrine of safe, clean, wasteless nuclear. Even if there was waste it is completely harmless, not a big deal, please look the other way. They can be no other ~~God~~.. I mean viable alternative for generating energy. Also, did you know ~~this straw man~~ .. I mean coal spreads nuclear isotopes too?