several old forums, [...] are being polluted by their own admins with backdated LLM-generated answers.
I've only heard about one specific physics forum. Are you telling me more than one person had this same idiotic idea?
gerikson
joined 2 years ago
That "Billionaires are not immune to AGI" post got a muted response on LW:
I still think AI x-risk obsession is right-libertarian coded. If nothing else because "alignment" implicitely means "alignment to the current extractive capitalist economic structure". There are a plethora of futures with an omnipotent AGI where humanity does not get eliminated, but where human freedoms (as defined by the Heritage Foundation) can be severely curtailed.
- mandatory euthanasia to prevent rampant boomerism and hoarding of wealth
- a genetically viable stable minimum population in harmony with the ecosphere
- AI planning of the economy to ensure maximum resource efficiency and equitable distribution
What LW and friends want are slaves, but slaves without any possibility of rebellion.
Wait until they find out it's not all iambic pentameter and Doric columns...
Translation is a good fit because generally the input is "bounded" and stays on the path of the original input. I'd much rather trust an ML system that translates a sentence or a paragraph than something that tries to summarize a longer text.
I enjoy the work for the 3 Macs from the British Isles:
- Ken McLeod - Scotland: Fall Revolution series, Newton's Wake, Learning the World
- Ian McDonald - Northern Ireland: Luna series, Brasyl. I'm currently on Hopeland
- Paul McAuley - England: Quiet War series, Fairyland
In general I prefer UK English SF, because it's a bit less infected by the pernicious frontier mentality of US mainstream SF. Note that there are very good American authors too who kinda push back on that, but my impression was formed when Christopher Priest and Jerry Pournelle were active and could be contrasted.
Hey, no kink-shaming.
Ken McLeod’s The Cassini Division tells the fate of all uploaded superhumans - blasted to plasma by bombardment of comet nuclei
This is classic labor busting. If the relatively expensive, hard-to-train and hard-to-recruit software engineers can be replaced by cheaper labor, of course employers will do so.
A hackernews doesn't think that LLMs will replace software engineers, but they will replace structural engineers:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43317725
The irony is that most structural engineers are actually de jure professionals, and an easy way for them to both protect their jobs and ensure future buildings don't crumble to dust or are constructed without sprinkler systems is to simply ban LLMs from being used. No such protection exists for software engineers.
Edit the LW post under discussion makes a ton of good points, to the level of being worthy of posting to this forum, and then nails its colors to the mast with this idiocy
At some unknown point – probably in 2030s, possibly tomorrow (but likely not tomorrow) – someone will figure out a different approach to AI. Maybe a slight tweak to the LLM architecture, maybe a completely novel neurosymbolic approach. Maybe it will happen in a major AGI lab, maybe in some new startup. By default, everyone will die in <1 year after that.
Gotta reaffirm the dogma!
Why put in the work when you can ask Claude to summarize them for you and reap those sweet sweet internet points?
I haven't read the book but I really enjoyed the movie.