feannag

joined 1 year ago
[–] feannag 2 points 5 months ago

On Android I use grayjay and it works great!

[–] feannag 15 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I mean, biblically speaking we weren't supposed to eat those apples.

[–] feannag 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, obviously it's not the point, but I would love a ban on car data collection instead.

[–] feannag 2 points 6 months ago

If you're navy captain lezbian I sure hope major is not in your future. Cheers to future admiralty!

[–] feannag 8 points 6 months ago

Ah, but you see, we consented to the cruelty against ourselves.

[–] feannag 49 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Is it really that shocking that a woman wouldn't want to be called girl or child? Sure, boy is still used. But in your post you used man, not boy. I'd say an easy rule is if you'd use the word man in a sentence, don't use the word girl.

[–] feannag 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] feannag 5 points 6 months ago

You forgot Vaporeon.

[–] feannag 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but not sure if it's life before death. Seems like death might come quickly.

[–] feannag 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The implementation is usually the issue. If white people/wealthy don't need to show documentation, for instance. Or they only check areas that are known democrat (or known Republican). And, at the end of the day, many people can't necessarily prove it, and the government does not guarantee free/quick access to citizenship documents, so it disproportionately affects poorer people.

Imagine if they changed this law 2 weeks before an election, and your birth certificate is in Clark county Texas while you live in Florida. It is a very easy way to disenfranchise voters and skew election results.

Eta: there's also no robust evidence that there is almost any voter fraud, much less wide spread. Especially around citizenship. Why risk deportation/prison to vote? So this probably won't solve a problem that doesn't exist, and will create "unintended" consequences for legitimate voters.

[–] feannag 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree that's how math works, but by reporting a negative percentage with it colored red is misleading at best. Perhaps a better metric would be +/- |(percent change)| where + indicates profit growth and and - indicates profit reduction?

[–] feannag 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

How is -0.5B -> 2.33B a -564% change?

view more: ‹ prev next ›