exapsy

joined 2 years ago
[–] exapsy 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Conscripted = Defend your country. Not attack another country. Russia just pretends they're "defending motherland" so they find an excuse to """"conscript (untrained) Russians"""" to go to war and they advertise "it's good money" literally everywhere. There are posters everywhere about it and so much propaganda and pro-war ads.

In any case, there is ALWAYS a choice. Even killing your own commander, or protesting against your government is a choice. So many Russians have literally abandoned their positions because they do not believe in this war. That was a choice. You always have a choice. Especially them, so many of them. Yes, difficult ones, but let's not pretend that they "do not have a choice". They do, they always did.

You always have a choice, than go to a war where you win nothing but kill innocent Ukrainians, committing war crimes and invading other country "to defend yours" which is their propaganda prorogative.

edit:

You know who "doesn't have a choice"? Ukrainians. They are there to defend their land. And the funny thing is, they do have a choice. They could just say "fuck it I won't do it". But they still stand. Even they, have a choice. And they chose to defend their land.

So let's not pretent that Russians, got conscripted thus they didn't have a choice. Everybody has a choice, and they have to live with it and die with it.

[–] exapsy 29 points 2 years ago (5 children)

«Мамочкааааааа»

Да?

Сейчас Розумієш што ета Война??

Now do you understand suddenly what war is? What democracy is? When to invade other peoples countries?

[–] exapsy 20 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Ouch! This looks painful. But Eh ... I dont care what they say, they decided to go there and die there, instead of pissing on their commander, dying for democracy instead and going anywhere else but in Ukraine to kill Ukrainians.

[–] exapsy 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good for her. How can you shake hands with somebody who's actively contesting on behalf of a country that is murdering your own people, committing war crimes, threatens the whole world with nuclear threats and puts bombs on your country's nuclear plant and plays with world hunger.

I understand the rules might be "respect your opponent", but that opponent should contest under a white or neutral flag. Not under a flag of a country that commits atrocities.

So, I would suggest the contesters and the people who make the rules to also take that under consideration. It's an insult to the rest of the world to contest under a flag like that.

[–] exapsy 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Even if they won't deliver, the fact alone that Qatar, a country known for it's own controversies, is against Russia .... says a lot. The pure advertisement alone that they support a state that is under a war conflict not by choice, but because they're attacked, shows that maybe ... you're the villain.

Russians can drink as much copium they want. But now its no longer """""just the west and NATO"""""

[–] exapsy 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Exactly, each tool for its job. Comparing tools like they're models (edit: Super models, as in Victoria secret, god I forgot we're nerds and we might think other things with term "model") in a model competition is just stupid and tired of seeing it.

Even at this point, in a world where Rust'ers LOVE to say "Rust is better than C++", C++ has its massive place in comparison to Rust because Rust treats you like a kid and in C++ you can build unsafe code for embedded systems and very low level code with more reliability and less maintenance and you'll be sure for it to be supported.

I'm for improving all languages, I mean the ones we use regularly, and for evolution or even building new languages to solve problems in a better way. But when it comes to just pure stupid comparisons and comparing apples to oranges it's just frustrating.

[–] exapsy 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Nop nop nop! If I ever make a single API in Rist ever again I’m gonna go to the last apartment’s floor, break the door for the roof, get a power cable from one of the solar panels installed there, tie it up to the door handle and then run and jump so I have a less painful death than writing a Rust “microservice”.

Rust is beautiful language. In its own weird way. But not for multithreading async communication. Let’s not start talking about tokio and async-std and their controversies and the language hasn’t figured out yet a standard way to do async. And definitely not for connecting to databases or other standard things you do very easily in Go or NodeJS, especially in Go where you have Goroutines and really easy to read and write maintainable code. Last time I wanted to connect to a database in Rust for a microservice I was doing 100 times more leaning the “ecosystem” of Postgres in rust or MongoDB, and I still didn’t manage to do it and so I thought wait a minute, every single time I’ll have to figure or someone else these shits out? Fuck it, back to Go.

I’ll do other things in Rust. Like pure system programming. Just …….. not web services.

[–] exapsy 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I see nothing wrong. It works as it should….. like what is that logic. The whole thing is not to buy Russian Oil. If we want Russian oil we better either find alternative or we use Russian Oil at a premium. That’s how sanctions are literally supposed to work.

[–] exapsy 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

but does ChatGPT retain any information on a server after scraping data from sites or does it always just look it up

ChatGPT is not a data scrapper, it's a deep neural network training model.

Data Scrapping ≠ Neural Networks.

The Neural Networks USE the data that is scrapped to train themselves.

Which means, if you ask it about data that it has not been trained on ... it will probably tell you it has no fucking idea what you're talking about. (edit: e.g. ask it about today's news ... it will reply that "It has been trained with data that is till September 2021")

[–] exapsy 2 points 2 years ago

Exactly on point. Sht-in-sht-out. If you feed it garbage it will tell you garbage. The researches and developers just happened to gather the "right" amount,quality and source of data. But it definitely does some mistakes and you have to correct it sometimes.

[–] exapsy 3 points 2 years ago

yeeeee more funny and accurate.

[–] exapsy 2 points 2 years ago

It's for Russians. Believe me. I know people. They definitely would. Everything non-russian for them is "Propaganda" and anything Russian is the only the truth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›