eacapesamsara

An opinion piece from the wsj and a story funded by the dnc?

That's what you based your confused worship of corporate bootlickers on?

Also I don't care how you people see me, you people already thought I was trash because I was poor, hysterical because I care about the climate, and a traitor because I think we shouldn't have an offensive military force or corporate owned government. returning insults isn't going to change how you see me, you never considered me a person in the first place. Hell you all thought I shouldn't get married just a decade ago.

Man you people have brain worms like trump worshippers. Yes granny, I'm sure sleepy Jill is totally taking billions from those filthy Soviet commies that want to eat your dogs and cats.

You have just proven my point, it's not a thing that happens in reality if it were you'd point to actual data, not randomly generated test cases where the hypothesis works assuming everyone has to vote and is going to vote.

To your second point, they not trying to win voters, Dems have never attempted to court anyone left of Reagan voters, ever. The point is demoralization. Non voters are better than energized voters that will never vote for you; the latter group protests, riots, threatens your monopoly on power.

Harris platform has exactly zero policies in common with the green party

The spoiler effect is at best a bad hypothesis, and has never been proven to effect actual votes.

People voting third party just would not vote if there was no third party option. This means there is no spoiler.