Lemmy does not support karma, but account age if I'm not mistaken. Maybe add a rule to require a certain account age before accepting a post. The main idea is to prevent astroturfing, spam accounts and socket puppets for ban evasion.
Not sure how effective this is since violators could setup an own instance which lies about the account age. Still quite the investment for ban evasion IMHO.
Out of curiosity, what turned you away from Firefox?
Why would I expect a sane reason? :D
Almost blurred all names. And what's up with the © behind her name?
Damn, a wedding suit (?) with a cape is absolutely awesome.
Looks like another attempt to push the "New UI" (in case it is an unfamiliar UI bothering you here)
Might be related to long TTL on DNS entries making it hard to connect one failure to a thing you changed days ago.
I see your "13 resets in a row" and raise you a "minimum password age".
It's even worse. If done correctly, the length of the password does not affect the size of the stored value. Because if you're doing it right, you only save the hash of the password. And the length of the hash is fixed.
They correctly placed ^^vv<><>BA on it but forgot to print START as well thinking the button in the car would suffice.
BGA would be even more trouble to manually manipulate. I kinda want to see a picture now of the repair attempt... :D
But you went the extra mile and set up your own instance to do this, right?
Nice bio btw.