Objectively incorrect
cyanarchy
Dude I'm not interested in going scorched earth on one of the most useful repositories of practical information and discussion, and I'm disturbed that you're so zealous to do so.
For what it's worth I personally find fallout 3 soulsucking. It's got interesting stuff throughout but it feels randomly scattered into a disjointed and confusing world.
New Vegas is a lot better at making the area feel like a cohesive environment. You understand petty easily why people are where they are and move along the routes they do. We're practically a cult so I'll spare you further recommendation.
Digipicking and a builder for a ship you can't meaningfully use were the only refreshing and engaging mechanics in that game.
Not on bare metal, for this reason
Just ripped a friend's entire collection using cyanrip. Might be more powerful tools out there but I wanted something from the CLI.
I wouldn't, but my biology disagrees.
There's an unbelievable amount of plot holes in fallout that are a lot easier to explain if you consider some folks in the post-post-apocalypse might be full of shit.
I know that almost nobody treats it this way but the number one rule of AUR is that it's pretty much all untrusted, by definition.
I agree with your stances but it's widely agreed among people who have to use the data generated that opt-in forms of telemetry are useless because of the way they skew results.
Were the provided instructions unclear?