If my only measure of worth was someone's job and the circumstances they acquired it, I would say that it is entirely irresponsible to make any fair judgement.
brian
joined 1 year ago
I mean, the full video was streamed and posted it looked like.
I believe you can get this by pressing and holding anywhere on the lock screen, which pops a button up at the bottom saying customize lock screen, or something similar
I don't get it. The heck is that supposed to be
This is a bit of chicken and egg, but if you've committed a crime, you are a criminal. If you've been accused of a crime, you are not a criminal, until you are proven to be guilty.
If youve been convicted, you've been found guilty. If you've been found guilty, that means you've committed a crime, and are a criminal.
In order to be an inmate (barring those await trials in jails) you must be a criminal.
Your concern, I think, is stemmed from the unfortunate stigma that follows criminals long after their rehabilitation/incarceration, which is a valid stance. However, if someone is currently in a prison, as an inmate, they must be a criminal in the eyes of the law. That doesn't mean they are criminals from then until the end of time, however.
But inmates are by definition criminals? They have been judged guilty and sentenced to time in prison.
Hotdogs are tacos and corn dogs are calzones.
Ah, I did not pick up on this being a resin printer. Thanks for the info, I'm not too aware on the tech behind resin
Not the OP, but what do you mean by this? I feel there's an implication that it should be laid out a different way?
My issue with the demands to have apple allow iMessage on other platforms is that then we could get stuck with the expectation of catering to those users.
There already are encrypted messengers like signal, telegram, or even WhatsApp. Why aren't people pushing at Apple users to make that switch themselves
Why would it be cutting your effective RAM in half? I know very little about hardware/software architecture and all that.
If you were found guilty by the courts, then yes in the eyes of the courts you have a committed the crime. If and when there are appeals, new evidence, or overturned verdicts, then that evaluation would change.
The whole point ends up being that criminal as a word has a specific definition, and those who have been convicted of crimes fit that definition.