I really like 8 but also understand that not all unfinished projects are caused by ADHD. So 2 it is.
bitfucker
joined 11 months ago
Yeah, that is the only weird part about it. I think AMD is cooking up something right now behind the curtain. Whether that something is good or bad we don't know yet but so far it does not look good.
Did he taste good?
Yep, I really hope that AMD is cooking up something. A shame that it's not open sourced but if it means going up against nvidia dominance now, I'll take their side just for that cause only.
You're not wrong. IIRC they already planned to stop or layoff their Dart developer in favour of Golang (also a language by Google)
Man, I never thought of it as a physical shitpost. Now it all makes sense.
I don't know what a co-op is, but I see the moderation system at BlueSky and think if that can be generalized then maybe that is the answer to a lot of centralization problems. So a node representing a peer can do basically anything that node operator/peer wishes including delegating his node operation to another node or a quorum of node. And if the peer wishes so, they could also take their node back anytime. For example in communication, we already have decentralized web of trust from PGP or other Public Key Infrastructure.
I think a better solution is to truly emulate what really happens in the real world via peer to peer networking, and appointing / trusting certain individual as an admin/moderator for the node. That way a node can choose to become independent or have a quorum system or fully trust a single other node. That is my idea anyway, I haven't dug much deeper into this idea.
You deserve a dedicated wikipedia page ma dude
The fuck are you talking about? I already gave an example of mindustry being free anywhere but steam. As long as they don't distribute the steam keys for free somewhere else, they are safe. Steam mandates that you put the lowest/price parity for the steam keys you sold outside of steam. If for example a game is being sold on steam priced at $15 with a 30% cut, the publishers are free to distribute the steam keys on their storefront for the same $15 without any cut. OR they could sell it cheaper BUT they cannot sell the steam keys. Maybe other storefront keys/drm. But the problem is, will the publisher sell it for a lower price knowing that they could sell it for the same price across the board with a higher profit margin?
If you wanted to argue that it is steam's fault for taking the 30% cut in the first place so we get where we are now, then I don't know what to tell you anymore. The problem is not steam but greed. Back to my example mindustry, that is a valid strategy to sell it for free everywhere but steam and is perfectly legal. It's just no one wanted to follow that model (instead of free, offer a cheaper price).
*Rant for the beginning of the article ahead
Why in the name of god did they try to bring LLM to the pictures. Saying AI/ML is good enough for predictive maintenance tasks, but noooo, it has to be LLM. If they want to be specific then don't be misleading, I think what they mean is the attention layer/operation commonly used in LLM to capture time series data. I understand that the Recurrent style neural network and LSTM has its limitations. And I agree that exploring attention to be used in time series data is an interesting research but LLM? Just no.